The Italian Version of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (LGBT-DOCSS): Validation Among Mental Health Professionals

INTRODUCTION: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals experience substantial health inequalities, and clinical competence among healthcare providers is a key determinant of equitable care. The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (LGBT-DOCSS) is a validated instrument for assessing SGM-related clinical competence, but no Italian version has been available. This study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Italian LGBT-DOCSS among mental health professionals. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was administered to clinicians and trainees across Italy between June and December 2024. Psychometric analyses were conducted on 345 participants with complete data on all 18 items. Internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Scalar multi-group CFA provided preliminary evidence consistent with measurement invariance across sexual orientation subgroups, and Spearman correlations with external measures of authoritarianism were examined. RESULTS: The original three-factor structure (Clinical Preparedness, Attitudinal Awareness, Basic Knowledge) was replicated with good model fit (CFI = 0.967, TLI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.058). Internal consistency was strong across all subscales (Cronbach's α ranging from .81 to .89; ordinal α ranging from .87 to .95). Scalar multi-group CFA supported measurement invariance across heterosexual and non-heterosexual subgroups (CFI = 0.944, RMSEA = 0.074), with non-heterosexual professionals demonstrating greater attitudinal affirmation and stronger awareness of SGM health disparities. Authoritarianism showed small-to-moderate associations with Basic Knowledge and Attitudinal Awareness. Significant differences by gender, sexual attraction and profession were observed, with nurses showing lower self-perceived SGM-related competence than other professional groups. DISCUSSION: The Italian LGBT-DOCSS demonstrates strong psychometric properties and is a valid tool for assessing SGM-related clinical competence among Italian mental health professionals. It can support the identification of training needs and the development of targeted educational interventions to improve care for SGM individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640261485556
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Italian Version of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (LGBT-DOCSS): Validation Among Mental Health Professionals

Federica Pinna, Mattia Marchi, Andrea Fiorillo, Markus Paul Bidell et al.
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

The Italian Version of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (LGBT-DOCSS): Validation Among Mental Health Professionals

Federica Pinna, Mattia Marchi, Andrea Fiorillo, Markus Paul Bidell, Giada Silveri, Gian Maria Galeazzi, Francesco Amaddeo, Manlio Converti, Massimo Mirandola, Alessandra Nazeri, Nigel Sherriff, Thomas Salvan, Antonio Ventriglio
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals experience substantial health inequalities, and clinical competence among healthcare providers is a key determinant of equitable care. The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale (LGBT-DOCSS) is a validated instrument for assessing SGM-related clinical competence, but no Italian version has been available. This study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Italian LGBT-DOCSS among mental health professionals. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was administered to clinicians and trainees across Italy between June and December 2024. Psychometric analyses were conducted on 345 participants with complete data on all 18 items. Internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Scalar multi-group CFA provided preliminary evidence consistent with measurement invariance across sexual orientation subgroups, and Spearman correlations with external measures of authoritarianism were examined. RESULTS: The original three-factor structure (Clinical Preparedness, Attitudinal Awareness, Basic Knowledge) was replicated with good model fit (CFI = 0.967, TLI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.058). Internal consistency was strong across all subscales (Cronbach's α ranging from .81 to .89; ordinal α ranging from .87 to .95). Scalar multi-group CFA supported measurement invariance across heterosexual and non-heterosexual subgroups (CFI = 0.944, RMSEA = 0.074), with non-heterosexual professionals demonstrating greater attitudinal affirmation and stronger awareness of SGM health disparities. Authoritarianism showed small-to-moderate associations with Basic Knowledge and Attitudinal Awareness. Significant differences by gender, sexual attraction and profession were observed, with nurses showing lower self-perceived SGM-related competence than other professional groups. DISCUSSION: The Italian LGBT-DOCSS demonstrates strong psychometric properties and is a valid tool for assessing SGM-related clinical competence among Italian mental health professionals. It can support the identification of training needs and the development of targeted educational interventions to improve care for SGM individuals.

International Journal of Social Psychiatry
University of Foggia (IT), University of Verona (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Davis & Elkins College (US), University of Cagliari (IT), City University of New York (US), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Hunter College (US), Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Brighton (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.