Development, validation, and visualization of a CT-based predictive model for pedicle screw loosening risk after posterior lumbar fusion

This study aimed to develop and validate a visualization-based predictive model for evaluating the risk of pedicle screw loosening (PSL) following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients with lumbar degenerative conditions. A total of 466 consecutive patients undergoing primary PLIF with pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative disease were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with prior spinal surgery, deformity, fracture, tumor, ankylosing spondylitis, metabolic bone disease, fixation involving more than four levels, screw redirection or malposition, or non-PSL-related reoperation within 12 months were excluded. Patients treated in 2016–2021 formed the derivation cohort, and those treated in 2022–2023 formed the temporal internal validation cohort. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors and develop a PSL risk-scoring model. Model robustness was assessed using 3,000-iteration bootstrap resampling, and a 5-fold cross-validation framework was used to generate receiver operating characteristic curves and calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Calibration and decision curve analyses were performed to evaluate model calibration and clinical utility. In the derivation cohort, the PSL incidence within 1 year was 22.74% (73/321). L 3 Hounsfield unit (HU), pedicle HU, and the lowest instrumented vertebra at S 1 were identified as independent PSL predictors. According to the risk-scoring categories, the probability of PSL was 2.8% for scores 0–2, 18.8% for 3–4, and 60.2% for 5–6. In the validation cohort, the PSL incidence within 1 year was 21.38% (31/145). The predicted and observed probabilities demonstrated good agreement, with a satisfactory model fit (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, P = 0.231), and the model provided meaningful net benefit in clinical decision-making. The model showed strong discriminative ability, with AUCs of 0.868 (95% CI: 0.825–0.914) and 0.846 (95% CI: 0.795–0.893) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The risk-scoring model derived from L 3 and pedicle HU values effectively predicted PSL following PLIF, highlighting the complementary roles of global and local bone mineral density in screw stability maintenance. This scoring system serves as a reliable and easy to use tool for evaluating PSL risk and holds potential for guiding preoperative evaluation and individualized treatment planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-04083-9
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Development, validation, and visualization of a CT-based predictive model for pedicle screw loosening risk after posterior lumbar fusion

Congying Zou, Lei Zang, Ruiyuan Chen, Minghui Liang et al.
BMC Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Development, validation, and visualization of a CT-based predictive model for pedicle screw loosening risk after posterior lumbar fusion

Congying Zou, Lei Zang, Ruiyuan Chen, Minghui Liang, Han Ke, Ning Fan, Yu Xi, Tianyi Wang, Shuo Yuan, Aobo Wang, Ziqian Ma
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate a visualization-based predictive model for evaluating the risk of pedicle screw loosening (PSL) following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients with lumbar degenerative conditions. A total of 466 consecutive patients undergoing primary PLIF with pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative disease were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with prior spinal surgery, deformity, fracture, tumor, ankylosing spondylitis, metabolic bone disease, fixation involving more than four levels, screw redirection or malposition, or non-PSL-related reoperation within 12 months were excluded. Patients treated in 2016–2021 formed the derivation cohort, and those treated in 2022–2023 formed the temporal internal validation cohort. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors and develop a PSL risk-scoring model. Model robustness was assessed using 3,000-iteration bootstrap resampling, and a 5-fold cross-validation framework was used to generate receiver operating characteristic curves and calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Calibration and decision curve analyses were performed to evaluate model calibration and clinical utility. In the derivation cohort, the PSL incidence within 1 year was 22.74% (73/321). L 3 Hounsfield unit (HU), pedicle HU, and the lowest instrumented vertebra at S 1 were identified as independent PSL predictors. According to the risk-scoring categories, the probability of PSL was 2.8% for scores 0–2, 18.8% for 3–4, and 60.2% for 5–6. In the validation cohort, the PSL incidence within 1 year was 21.38% (31/145). The predicted and observed probabilities demonstrated good agreement, with a satisfactory model fit (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, P = 0.231), and the model provided meaningful net benefit in clinical decision-making. The model showed strong discriminative ability, with AUCs of 0.868 (95% CI: 0.825–0.914) and 0.846 (95% CI: 0.795–0.893) in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The risk-scoring model derived from L 3 and pedicle HU values effectively predicted PSL following PLIF, highlighting the complementary roles of global and local bone mineral density in screw stability maintenance. This scoring system serves as a reliable and easy to use tool for evaluating PSL risk and holds potential for guiding preoperative evaluation and individualized treatment planning.

BMC Surgery
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.