Stage-tailored role of extrahepatic bile duct resection in gallbladder cancer: limited value in T2 disease and potential oncologic role in selected T3/T4 cases

The oncological value of extrahepatic bile duct resection (EBDR) in gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains controversial, particularly regarding its stage-specific benefit. We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients with pathologically confirmed T2–T4 GBC who underwent curative-intent R0 resection between 1985 and 2018. EBDR was selectively performed based on intraoperative findings, including lymph node metastasis, positive cystic duct margins, or direct duodenal invasion. Patients were stratified by tumor stage (T2 vs. T3/T4). Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence patterns were evaluated. In the overall cohort, EBDR was not associated with significant differences in DFS or OS. Among T2 patients ( n = 42), survival outcomes were comparable between the EBDR( +) and EBDR(–) groups (5-year OS: 87.5% vs. 91.0%, P = 0.63; 5-year DFS: 87.5% vs. 92.4%, P = 0.61). In contrast, among T3/T4 patients ( n = 22), EBDR was associated with significantly improved 5-year OS (78.8% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.0023) and a favorable trend toward improved 5-year DFS (43.6% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.069), despite a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion (72.7% vs 24.3%, P = 0.043) in the EBDR( +) group. Local recurrence occurred exclusively in the EBDR(–) group (22% vs. 0%). Routine EBDR appears unnecessary for T2 GBC. In T3/T4 disease, EBDR was associated with better OS and a lower observed frequency of local recurrence; however, these exploratory findings require validation in larger cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04192-2
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stage-tailored role of extrahepatic bile duct resection in gallbladder cancer: limited value in T2 disease and potential oncologic role in selected T3/T4 cases

Yuki Ushimaru, Masaaki Miyo, Masayuki Ohue, Yoshinori Kagawa et al.
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Stage-tailored role of extrahepatic bile duct resection in gallbladder cancer: limited value in T2 disease and potential oncologic role in selected T3/T4 cases

Yuki Ushimaru, Masaaki Miyo, Masayuki Ohue, Yoshinori Kagawa, Hiroshi Wada, Hiroshi Miyata, Ryota Mori, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Hisateru Komatsu, Yasunori Masuike, Toshinori Sueda, Masatoshi Kitakaze, Norihiro Matsuura, Takahito Sugase, Masahiko Kubo, Kunihito Gotoh, Kei Yamamoto, Shogo Kobayashi, Junichi Nishimura, Yasunari Fukuda, Takashi Kanemura, Shinichiro Hasegawa
article en

Abstract

The oncological value of extrahepatic bile duct resection (EBDR) in gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains controversial, particularly regarding its stage-specific benefit. We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients with pathologically confirmed T2–T4 GBC who underwent curative-intent R0 resection between 1985 and 2018. EBDR was selectively performed based on intraoperative findings, including lymph node metastasis, positive cystic duct margins, or direct duodenal invasion. Patients were stratified by tumor stage (T2 vs. T3/T4). Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence patterns were evaluated. In the overall cohort, EBDR was not associated with significant differences in DFS or OS. Among T2 patients ( n = 42), survival outcomes were comparable between the EBDR( +) and EBDR(–) groups (5-year OS: 87.5% vs. 91.0%, P = 0.63; 5-year DFS: 87.5% vs. 92.4%, P = 0.61). In contrast, among T3/T4 patients ( n = 22), EBDR was associated with significantly improved 5-year OS (78.8% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.0023) and a favorable trend toward improved 5-year DFS (43.6% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.069), despite a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion (72.7% vs 24.3%, P = 0.043) in the EBDR( +) group. Local recurrence occurred exclusively in the EBDR(–) group (22% vs. 0%). Routine EBDR appears unnecessary for T2 GBC. In T3/T4 disease, EBDR was associated with better OS and a lower observed frequency of local recurrence; however, these exploratory findings require validation in larger cohorts.

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.