Sex differences in face looking preferences at birth

Abstract While sex differences in behaviour have attracted considerable scientific interest, their underlying causes are complex and remain poorly understood. One approach to understand whether early biological factors might play a partial role is to study newborns, who have limited postnatal experiences. Previous research on neonatal sex differences is extremely limited, and studies that do exist have yielded mixed results, raised methodological concerns, and are yet to be replicated. To assess these gaps, the present study aimed to reevaluate sex differences in neonatal attention. 130 neonates (67 males, 63 females; mean age = 33 h) were presented with a video of a human face and a non-social object. When analysing percentage looking times, on average, females allocated a greater percentage of time looking at the face relative to males ( d = 0.40). When analysing absolute looking times, females showed a preference for the face compared to the non-social object, while males showed no preference for either. However, no differences were observed between males’ and females’ absolute looking times for the face or object, indicating that sex differences are most prominent in the relative allocation of attention. Since sex differences in relative attentional patterns are present from the earliest days of life, one possible explanation for this effect may be due to contributions from prenatal factors (e.g., sex hormones). However, alternative explanations may be that these differences reflect general maturational differences between males and females or arise from low-level visual properties of the stimuli rather than their social versus non-social content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology of Sex Differences
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-026-00976-9
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex differences in face looking preferences at birth

Topun Austin, Eden Hymanson, APEX Consortium, Yumnah Khan et al.
Biology of Sex Differences
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Sex differences in face looking preferences at birth

Topun Austin, Eden Hymanson, APEX Consortium, Yumnah Khan, Simon Baron-Cohen, Alex Tsompanidis, Carrie Allison, Simon Baron-Cohen, Sehanya Wickramanayake, Carrie Allison
article en

Abstract

Abstract While sex differences in behaviour have attracted considerable scientific interest, their underlying causes are complex and remain poorly understood. One approach to understand whether early biological factors might play a partial role is to study newborns, who have limited postnatal experiences. Previous research on neonatal sex differences is extremely limited, and studies that do exist have yielded mixed results, raised methodological concerns, and are yet to be replicated. To assess these gaps, the present study aimed to reevaluate sex differences in neonatal attention. 130 neonates (67 males, 63 females; mean age = 33 h) were presented with a video of a human face and a non-social object. When analysing percentage looking times, on average, females allocated a greater percentage of time looking at the face relative to males ( d = 0.40). When analysing absolute looking times, females showed a preference for the face compared to the non-social object, while males showed no preference for either. However, no differences were observed between males’ and females’ absolute looking times for the face or object, indicating that sex differences are most prominent in the relative allocation of attention. Since sex differences in relative attentional patterns are present from the earliest days of life, one possible explanation for this effect may be due to contributions from prenatal factors (e.g., sex hormones). However, alternative explanations may be that these differences reflect general maturational differences between males and females or arise from low-level visual properties of the stimuli rather than their social versus non-social content.

Biology of Sex Differences
University of Cambridge (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Simons Foundation, Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Cambridge Trust, Medical Research Council, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration East of England, Trinity College
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.