The EU in NATO’s World? Ukraine, Kosovo, and the Limits of European Conflict Management

This thesis analyzes the evolving role of the European Union (EU) in conflict management, comparing its actions in Ukraine and Kosovo against varying levels of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) involvement. Rather than judging the EU's voyage into the conflict space by traditional NATO military standards, this thesis addresses a gap in the literature by evaluating the EU's actions through the lens of its specific toolset. The coding framework codes official EU, NATO, and third-party documents across four key dimensions, including NATO involvement level, EU-NATO interaction type, EU function, and EU effectiveness. The comparative findings indicate that NATO involvement does not crowd out EU relevance but shifts where it appears. Ukraine exemplifies EU relevance under NATO-dominated security, while Kosovo exhibits EU leadership under NATO-enabled security. Across both cases, complementary EU-NATO interaction is the most common pattern, yet it yields partial rather than full effectiveness in most coded rows. EU effectiveness in conflict management is conditional and depends on the functions it performs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/ssm3-8x22
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The EU in NATO’s World? Ukraine, Kosovo, and the Limits of European Conflict Management

Connor Zamora
UNC Libraries
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

The EU in NATO’s World? Ukraine, Kosovo, and the Limits of European Conflict Management

Connor Zamora
article en

Abstract

This thesis analyzes the evolving role of the European Union (EU) in conflict management, comparing its actions in Ukraine and Kosovo against varying levels of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) involvement. Rather than judging the EU's voyage into the conflict space by traditional NATO military standards, this thesis addresses a gap in the literature by evaluating the EU's actions through the lens of its specific toolset. The coding framework codes official EU, NATO, and third-party documents across four key dimensions, including NATO involvement level, EU-NATO interaction type, EU function, and EU effectiveness. The comparative findings indicate that NATO involvement does not crowd out EU relevance but shifts where it appears. Ukraine exemplifies EU relevance under NATO-dominated security, while Kosovo exhibits EU leadership under NATO-enabled security. Across both cases, complementary EU-NATO interaction is the most common pattern, yet it yields partial rather than full effectiveness in most coded rows. EU effectiveness in conflict management is conditional and depends on the functions it performs.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.