Quality and reliability of BPPV videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study

Background Short-video platforms increasingly provide health information, but content quality varies, and evidence on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) videos remains limited.Objective To assess the quality and reliability of BPPV-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili and examine home repositioning, maneuver–canal compatibility, and misleading information.Methods On 4 March 2026, we searched both platforms and included 135 videos (TikTok, 77; Bilibili, 58), assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and JAMA criteria.Results Overall video quality was moderate (median GQS: 4; mDISCERN: 3; JAMA: 2). Bilibili scored higher on GQS (p = 0.027), whereas TikTok scored higher on JAMA (p < 0.001). Otolaryngologist-uploaded videos had higher mDISCERN and JAMA scores than individual-user videos (adjusted p < 0.001 and p = 0.022). Engagement showed limited association with quality. Home-repositioning videos had higher GQS (p = 0.041), though GQS does not assess procedural accuracy. Four of 20 Epley-maneuver videos (20.0%) showed maneuver–canal mismatches; misleading information occurred in 16 videos (11.9%), mainly oversimplified mechanisms and incorrect instructions.Conclusions BPPV-related short videos are of moderate quality, with performance varying across assessment dimensions. Engagement did not reliably indicate information quality. Maneuver–canal mismatches and incorrect instructions support greater otolaryngologist involvement and professional review.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2026.2713948
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality and reliability of BPPV videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study

Xuyang Feng, Xi Wu
Critical Public Health
Vestibular and auditory disorders
article

Quality and reliability of BPPV videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study

Xuyang Feng, Xi Wu
article en

Abstract

Background Short-video platforms increasingly provide health information, but content quality varies, and evidence on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) videos remains limited.Objective To assess the quality and reliability of BPPV-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili and examine home repositioning, maneuver–canal compatibility, and misleading information.Methods On 4 March 2026, we searched both platforms and included 135 videos (TikTok, 77; Bilibili, 58), assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and JAMA criteria.Results Overall video quality was moderate (median GQS: 4; mDISCERN: 3; JAMA: 2). Bilibili scored higher on GQS (p = 0.027), whereas TikTok scored higher on JAMA (p < 0.001). Otolaryngologist-uploaded videos had higher mDISCERN and JAMA scores than individual-user videos (adjusted p < 0.001 and p = 0.022). Engagement showed limited association with quality. Home-repositioning videos had higher GQS (p = 0.041), though GQS does not assess procedural accuracy. Four of 20 Epley-maneuver videos (20.0%) showed maneuver–canal mismatches; misleading information occurred in 16 videos (11.9%), mainly oversimplified mechanisms and incorrect instructions.Conclusions BPPV-related short videos are of moderate quality, with performance varying across assessment dimensions. Engagement did not reliably indicate information quality. Maneuver–canal mismatches and incorrect instructions support greater otolaryngologist involvement and professional review.

Critical Public HealthVol. 36(1)
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.