Family relationship profiles and their associations with children's academic school readiness and approaches to learning

ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to explore latent profiles of family relationships based on marital quality, coparenting, and parent–child relationships, and examine their associations with children's academic school readiness and approaches to learning with a Chinese sample. Background Previous research often used variable‐centered approaches, which potentially overlook unique relationship configurations and their influence on children. Method At the beginning of kindergarten, both fathers and mothers from 366 families completed questionnaires of demographic information, child temperament, and family relationship variables. At the end of kindergarten, research assistants assessed children's academic school readiness, and the primary caregivers reported children's approaches to learning. Results Five family relationship profiles emerged: highly cohesive, moderately cohesive, and dysfunctional families showed consistently high, moderate, and poor relationship quality across all subsystems, respectively. Compensatory families had poor marital quality and coparenting quality but low parent–child conflict. Unbalanced families exhibited contrasting evaluations between mothers and fathers across subsystems. Although family relationship profiles did not predict children's school readiness on math, language and literacy, they made significant differences in children's approaches to learning. Conclusion The findings reveal variations of families in the synchronism of relationship quality across subsystems. Families with boundaries across subsystems showed some buffering effect on children's approaches to learning. Implications This study underscores the value of a family‐centered approach in capturing the complexity of family dynamics. Furthermore, maintaining subsystem boundaries may help families experiencing difficulties in certain relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family Relations
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.70261
Primary Topic
Parental Involvement in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family relationship profiles and their associations with children's academic school readiness and approaches to learning

Lixin Ren, Siwei Liu, Jieqiong Fan, Lin Li
Family Relations
Parental Involvement in Education
article

Family relationship profiles and their associations with children's academic school readiness and approaches to learning

Lixin Ren, Siwei Liu, Jieqiong Fan, Lin Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to explore latent profiles of family relationships based on marital quality, coparenting, and parent–child relationships, and examine their associations with children's academic school readiness and approaches to learning with a Chinese sample. Background Previous research often used variable‐centered approaches, which potentially overlook unique relationship configurations and their influence on children. Method At the beginning of kindergarten, both fathers and mothers from 366 families completed questionnaires of demographic information, child temperament, and family relationship variables. At the end of kindergarten, research assistants assessed children's academic school readiness, and the primary caregivers reported children's approaches to learning. Results Five family relationship profiles emerged: highly cohesive, moderately cohesive, and dysfunctional families showed consistently high, moderate, and poor relationship quality across all subsystems, respectively. Compensatory families had poor marital quality and coparenting quality but low parent–child conflict. Unbalanced families exhibited contrasting evaluations between mothers and fathers across subsystems. Although family relationship profiles did not predict children's school readiness on math, language and literacy, they made significant differences in children's approaches to learning. Conclusion The findings reveal variations of families in the synchronism of relationship quality across subsystems. Families with boundaries across subsystems showed some buffering effect on children's approaches to learning. Implications This study underscores the value of a family‐centered approach in capturing the complexity of family dynamics. Furthermore, maintaining subsystem boundaries may help families experiencing difficulties in certain relationships.

Family Relations
Shanghai Innovative Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), East China Normal University (CN), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN), University of California, Davis (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Parental Involvement in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.