Clinical Information Fidelity (CIF): A Task-Defined Framework for Evaluating Information Preservation Across Clinical Transformations

Clinical information increasingly passes through automated transformations such as speech recognition, summarization, translation, ambient documentation, and generative reformulation. Existing evaluation methods address lexical accuracy, semantic similarity, clinical entity overlap, factual discrepancies, and document quality, but do not necessarily make explicit which clinical information a particular transformation was required to preserve. This work proposes Clinical Information Fidelity (CIF), a task-defined framework in which transformation-specific preservation requirements are specified independently of the candidate output and evaluated separately from the mechanism used to assess preservation. For source information (X) and transformation (T), a preservation specification (C_T(X)) defines the clinical information units required to survive. Baseline CIF represents the proportion of those requirements satisfied by output (Y). CIF is not proposed as a semantic similarity algorithm, hallucination metric, correctness score, completeness score, or general measure of clinical document quality. It formalizes one specific evaluation dimension: preservation of required clinical information across transformation. Status: Conceptual framework. Not empirically or clinically validated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22030256
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Clinical Information Fidelity (CIF): A Task-Defined Framework for Evaluating Information Preservation Across Clinical Transformations

Daniel Barcan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Electronic Health Records Systems
preprint

Clinical Information Fidelity (CIF): A Task-Defined Framework for Evaluating Information Preservation Across Clinical Transformations

Daniel Barcan
preprint en

Abstract

Clinical information increasingly passes through automated transformations such as speech recognition, summarization, translation, ambient documentation, and generative reformulation. Existing evaluation methods address lexical accuracy, semantic similarity, clinical entity overlap, factual discrepancies, and document quality, but do not necessarily make explicit which clinical information a particular transformation was required to preserve. This work proposes Clinical Information Fidelity (CIF), a task-defined framework in which transformation-specific preservation requirements are specified independently of the candidate output and evaluated separately from the mechanism used to assess preservation. For source information (X) and transformation (T), a preservation specification (C_T(X)) defines the clinical information units required to survive. Baseline CIF represents the proportion of those requirements satisfied by output (Y). CIF is not proposed as a semantic similarity algorithm, hallucination metric, correctness score, completeness score, or general measure of clinical document quality. It formalizes one specific evaluation dimension: preservation of required clinical information across transformation. Status: Conceptual framework. Not empirically or clinically validated.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
AltaMed (US)
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.