What's Transparent About Transparent Idioms?

Linguists have long assumed that transparent idioms are easier to understand than opaque ones. However, transparency effects have proven task-dependent. Additionally, many studies supporting transparency advantages tested adults or older children. Prior studies of autistic and other clinical populations have also yielded mixed results. In the present study, participants (fifteen children between the ages of 6;5 and 10;6) performed similarly on transparent and opaque idioms. Autistic children without language impairment did not differ significantly from their typically developing peers on any outcome. Several Children’s Communication Checklist-2 measures significantly correlated with transparent idiom performance. No measure predicted opaque idiom performance. The main finding is that children with strong language abilities showed a transparency advantage, and children with weaker language skills showed an opaque advantage. Skilled communicators use transparency to recall idioms’ meanings, but this is not a default strategy for the average child.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/mnhn-7q10
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What's Transparent About Transparent Idioms?

Rebecca Blaine Galloway
UNC Libraries
Language Development and Disorders
article

What's Transparent About Transparent Idioms?

Rebecca Blaine Galloway
article en

Abstract

Linguists have long assumed that transparent idioms are easier to understand than opaque ones. However, transparency effects have proven task-dependent. Additionally, many studies supporting transparency advantages tested adults or older children. Prior studies of autistic and other clinical populations have also yielded mixed results. In the present study, participants (fifteen children between the ages of 6;5 and 10;6) performed similarly on transparent and opaque idioms. Autistic children without language impairment did not differ significantly from their typically developing peers on any outcome. Several Children’s Communication Checklist-2 measures significantly correlated with transparent idiom performance. No measure predicted opaque idiom performance. The main finding is that children with strong language abilities showed a transparency advantage, and children with weaker language skills showed an opaque advantage. Skilled communicators use transparency to recall idioms’ meanings, but this is not a default strategy for the average child.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What's Transparent About Transparent Idioms? — Rebecca Blaine Galloway · UNC Libraries (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS