The Safety and Complication Rate of Deep Plane Facelift Under Local Anesthesia

Abstract Background The deep plane facelift is traditionally performed under general anesthesia or intravenous (IV) sedation. As demand increases among older patients and those with comorbidities, interest has grown in performing comprehensive facelift surgery under local anesthesia; however, safety data remains limited. Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate the complication rate associated with deep plane facelift surgery performed under local anesthesia and to compare these outcomes with established complication rates reported in the literature. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of 142 consecutive patients who underwent primary deep plane facelift and neck lift under local anesthesia with oral sedation. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon in an office-based facility with a minimum follow-up of 90 days. Major and minor complications were recorded and compared with established complication rates for deep plane facelift reported in the literature using odds ratio analysis. Results The mean patient age was 63.5 years. There were no major hematomas, skin necrosis, or temporary or permanent facial nerve injuries. Minor complications included seroma (3.52%), minor hematoma (0.70%), and localized infection (1.40%), all resolving with conservative management. No patients required hospitalization or experienced thromboembolic events. Complication rates did not differ significantly from published data (p > 0.05). Conclusions Deep plane facelift with neck lift can be safely performed under local anesthesia with oral sedation, demonstrating complication rates in this cohort that are no higher than published benchmark rates for patients receiving general anesthesia or IV sedation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojag156
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Safety and Complication Rate of Deep Plane Facelift Under Local Anesthesia

Sarah Novis
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
article

The Safety and Complication Rate of Deep Plane Facelift Under Local Anesthesia

Sarah Novis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The deep plane facelift is traditionally performed under general anesthesia or intravenous (IV) sedation. As demand increases among older patients and those with comorbidities, interest has grown in performing comprehensive facelift surgery under local anesthesia; however, safety data remains limited. Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate the complication rate associated with deep plane facelift surgery performed under local anesthesia and to compare these outcomes with established complication rates reported in the literature. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of 142 consecutive patients who underwent primary deep plane facelift and neck lift under local anesthesia with oral sedation. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon in an office-based facility with a minimum follow-up of 90 days. Major and minor complications were recorded and compared with established complication rates for deep plane facelift reported in the literature using odds ratio analysis. Results The mean patient age was 63.5 years. There were no major hematomas, skin necrosis, or temporary or permanent facial nerve injuries. Minor complications included seroma (3.52%), minor hematoma (0.70%), and localized infection (1.40%), all resolving with conservative management. No patients required hospitalization or experienced thromboembolic events. Complication rates did not differ significantly from published data (p > 0.05). Conclusions Deep plane facelift with neck lift can be safely performed under local anesthesia with oral sedation, demonstrating complication rates in this cohort that are no higher than published benchmark rates for patients receiving general anesthesia or IV sedation.

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Carolina Urologic Research Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.