The application of excess hazard models for plausible long-term extrapolation in cost-effectiveness: a re-evaluation of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer using the KEYNOTE-024 trial

BACKGROUND: Economic evaluations often rely on immature data to evaluate cost-effectiveness of new treatments. Pembrolizumab was approved for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression based on interim data from the KEYNOTE-024 trial. Using 5-year follow-up data, we re-evaluated the cost-effectiveness analysis to assess optimal survival models and their impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed from the national payer's perspective. Standard parametric distribution (SPD) models and excess hazard (EH) models were fitted to digitally reconstructed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) data from the 11-month interim and 5-year follow-up data from KEYNOTE-024. EH models incorporated general population mortality (GPM) rates to ensure stability and consistency in modelling OS and PFS. Model inputs were primarily derived from the prior assessment by the Swedish Health Technology Assessment agency. Uncertainties around survival models and inputs were examined in probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULTS: We demonstrated that incorporating the relative survival framework, using EH models, provided a more suitable modelling approach than SPD models when applied to immature survival data from a clinical trial. The SPD exponential models produced overly pessimistic projections, while the SPD log-normal models produced overly optimistic projections. The EH log-normal models without a cure assumption aligned closely with the follow-up data, producing realistic and consistent projections across interim and follow-up data. Scatter plots from the EH models exhibited reduced variability than the SPD models in PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Model selection should prioritize realistic survival projections with the use of EH models that incorporate GPM adjustment potentially preferred over SPD models. Models that accommodate waning disease-specific mortality with or without a cure assumption should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Journal of Health Economics
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-026-01981-w
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The application of excess hazard models for plausible long-term extrapolation in cost-effectiveness: a re-evaluation of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer using the KEYNOTE-024 trial

Linus Jönsson, Kun Kim, Michael Sweeting, Nils Wilking
The European Journal of Health Economics
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

The application of excess hazard models for plausible long-term extrapolation in cost-effectiveness: a re-evaluation of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer using the KEYNOTE-024 trial

Linus Jönsson, Kun Kim, Michael Sweeting, Nils Wilking
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Economic evaluations often rely on immature data to evaluate cost-effectiveness of new treatments. Pembrolizumab was approved for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression based on interim data from the KEYNOTE-024 trial. Using 5-year follow-up data, we re-evaluated the cost-effectiveness analysis to assess optimal survival models and their impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed from the national payer's perspective. Standard parametric distribution (SPD) models and excess hazard (EH) models were fitted to digitally reconstructed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) data from the 11-month interim and 5-year follow-up data from KEYNOTE-024. EH models incorporated general population mortality (GPM) rates to ensure stability and consistency in modelling OS and PFS. Model inputs were primarily derived from the prior assessment by the Swedish Health Technology Assessment agency. Uncertainties around survival models and inputs were examined in probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). RESULTS: We demonstrated that incorporating the relative survival framework, using EH models, provided a more suitable modelling approach than SPD models when applied to immature survival data from a clinical trial. The SPD exponential models produced overly pessimistic projections, while the SPD log-normal models produced overly optimistic projections. The EH log-normal models without a cure assumption aligned closely with the follow-up data, producing realistic and consistent projections across interim and follow-up data. Scatter plots from the EH models exhibited reduced variability than the SPD models in PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Model selection should prioritize realistic survival projections with the use of EH models that incorporate GPM adjustment potentially preferred over SPD models. Models that accommodate waning disease-specific mortality with or without a cure assumption should be considered.

The European Journal of Health Economics
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Nordic School of Public Health (SE)
Karolinska Institutet
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.