Midwives’ perspectives on risk classification in the German maternity record (Mutterpass): an exploratory survey

OBJECTIVES: Risk stratification in pregnancy based on Catalogue A in the German maternity record (Mutterpass) represents an established component of antenatal care. The aim of the study is to explore the perspectives and opinions of German midwives on the current risk classification during pregnancy. METHODS: Between May and July 2025, midwives across Germany were surveyed using the online REDCap platform regarding their opinions on the current risk classification in pregnancy. As part of the FeMaR (Fetomaternal Risk Score) project, this exploratory survey among healthcare professionals was conducted prior to the development of a future pregnancy risk stratification model. Participation was anonymous and voluntary, with one response permitted per device. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Data from 220 midwives were included in the analysis. More than half of respondents reported that the current risk classification is largely subjective and lacks specificity. Suggested approaches for further development included weighting individual risk factors, re-evaluating risk over the course of pregnancy, and enabling a more differentiated assessment of individual risk constellations. Midwives additionally emphasized the relevance of social determinants of health, experiences of violence, physical activity, and dietary habits in the context of pregnancy risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support existing evidence that pregnancy- and birth-related risks vary substantially depending on individual risk factors and may change over the course of pregnancy. From the midwives' perspectives, there appears to be a need for more differentiated and dynamically adaptable approaches to pregnancy risk stratification in future clinical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2026-0133
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Midwives’ perspectives on risk classification in the German maternity record (Mutterpass): an exploratory survey

Stephanie Roll, Julia Sommer, Jon Barrenetxea, Christiana Ernst et al.
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Midwives’ perspectives on risk classification in the German maternity record (Mutterpass): an exploratory survey

Stephanie Roll, Julia Sommer, Jon Barrenetxea, Christiana Ernst, Elias Grünewald, Silke Wegener, Florian Recker, Barbara Tabernig, Louisa Sommer, Felix Balzer, Ingrid Sonnabend, Eva Jansen, Waleed Alshamandi, Charlotte K. Metz
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Risk stratification in pregnancy based on Catalogue A in the German maternity record (Mutterpass) represents an established component of antenatal care. The aim of the study is to explore the perspectives and opinions of German midwives on the current risk classification during pregnancy. METHODS: Between May and July 2025, midwives across Germany were surveyed using the online REDCap platform regarding their opinions on the current risk classification in pregnancy. As part of the FeMaR (Fetomaternal Risk Score) project, this exploratory survey among healthcare professionals was conducted prior to the development of a future pregnancy risk stratification model. Participation was anonymous and voluntary, with one response permitted per device. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Data from 220 midwives were included in the analysis. More than half of respondents reported that the current risk classification is largely subjective and lacks specificity. Suggested approaches for further development included weighting individual risk factors, re-evaluating risk over the course of pregnancy, and enabling a more differentiated assessment of individual risk constellations. Midwives additionally emphasized the relevance of social determinants of health, experiences of violence, physical activity, and dietary habits in the context of pregnancy risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support existing evidence that pregnancy- and birth-related risks vary substantially depending on individual risk factors and may change over the course of pregnancy. From the midwives' perspectives, there appears to be a need for more differentiated and dynamically adaptable approaches to pregnancy risk stratification in future clinical care.

Journal of Perinatal Medicine
University Hospital Bonn (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Universitätsmedizin Rostock (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE), University of Rostock (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.