Assessing drone-based direct seeding with bare and encapsulated seeds for enriching degraded tropical forest fragments

Restoring degraded forest fragments often requires reintroducing native tree species lost through disturbances including logging, fire, and fragmentation, yet the operational and financial feasibility of this intervention remains a barrier. We evaluated the ecological and economic feasibility of drone-based seeding of encapsulated and non-encapsulated (bare) seeds in degraded fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Seeds were encapsulated in cassava starch capsules containing hydrogel, fertilized organic substrate, and mycorrhizal fungi. Twenty native tree species were sown by drones (35,926 seeds ha −1 ) into two degraded fragments. Seedling emergence, survival, and establishment were monitored for 12 months. Encapsulated seeds germinated faster and produced more seedlings than bare seeds during the first month (2891 vs. 1605 seedlings ha −1 ). However, high post-emergence mortality, likely driven by capsule components inducing premature germination misaligned with favorable environmental conditions, offset this early advantage. After one year, bare seeds had higher establishment (4.14%, 1487 seedlings ha −1 vs. 2.19%, 787 seedlings ha −1 ) and lower cost per established seedling (USD 0.44 vs. USD 3.87) than encapsulated seeds. Drone operation was highly efficient for bare seeds, with one hectare sown in ∼6.9 min in a single flight. Conversely, the greater volume of encapsulated seeds required multiple flights, totaling 16.4 min ha −1 of flight time, excluding tank refilling. Bare seeds outperformed encapsulated seeds in establishment, cost-effectiveness, and operational efficiency. Further studies are needed to assess longer-term tree recruitment and to test different capsule formulations and sizes. Nevertheless, the operational feasibility and cost-effectiveness for bare seeds suggest that drone-based seeding is promising for enriching degraded forests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Engineering
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.108146
Primary Topic
Seedling growth and survival studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing drone-based direct seeding with bare and encapsulated seeds for enriching degraded tropical forest fragments

Paulo Guilherme Molin, Gilber Paolo Zamora Bringas, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Pedro H. S. Brancalion et al.
Ecological Engineering
Seedling growth and survival studies
article

Assessing drone-based direct seeding with bare and encapsulated seeds for enriching degraded tropical forest fragments

Paulo Guilherme Molin, Gilber Paolo Zamora Bringas, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, Ítalo Favoreto Campanharo, João Paulo Bispo Santos
article en

Abstract

Restoring degraded forest fragments often requires reintroducing native tree species lost through disturbances including logging, fire, and fragmentation, yet the operational and financial feasibility of this intervention remains a barrier. We evaluated the ecological and economic feasibility of drone-based seeding of encapsulated and non-encapsulated (bare) seeds in degraded fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Seeds were encapsulated in cassava starch capsules containing hydrogel, fertilized organic substrate, and mycorrhizal fungi. Twenty native tree species were sown by drones (35,926 seeds ha −1 ) into two degraded fragments. Seedling emergence, survival, and establishment were monitored for 12 months. Encapsulated seeds germinated faster and produced more seedlings than bare seeds during the first month (2891 vs. 1605 seedlings ha −1 ). However, high post-emergence mortality, likely driven by capsule components inducing premature germination misaligned with favorable environmental conditions, offset this early advantage. After one year, bare seeds had higher establishment (4.14%, 1487 seedlings ha −1 vs. 2.19%, 787 seedlings ha −1 ) and lower cost per established seedling (USD 0.44 vs. USD 3.87) than encapsulated seeds. Drone operation was highly efficient for bare seeds, with one hectare sown in ∼6.9 min in a single flight. Conversely, the greater volume of encapsulated seeds required multiple flights, totaling 16.4 min ha −1 of flight time, excluding tank refilling. Bare seeds outperformed encapsulated seeds in establishment, cost-effectiveness, and operational efficiency. Further studies are needed to assess longer-term tree recruitment and to test different capsule formulations and sizes. Nevertheless, the operational feasibility and cost-effectiveness for bare seeds suggest that drone-based seeding is promising for enriching degraded forests.

Ecological EngineeringVol. 233
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Fundação de Estudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz (BR), Forest Science and Research Institute (BR), International Center for Tropical Agriculture (KE), Universidade Metropolitana de Santos (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Seedling growth and survival studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.