Quality and reliability of lung cancer–related short videos in China: a cross-sectional content analysis study

Lung cancer has emerged as one of the most prevalent diseases in China in recent years, leading to heightened public concerns regarding its substantial disease burden. Short videos on lung cancer are disseminated through TikTok, Bilibili and Redbook apps, which have become an easily accessible source of seeking health information. However, the informational quality, accuracy and reliability of short videos remain systematically unexamined. In January 1st, 2026, we screened the lung cancer-related videos and assessed the basic information presented in them on TikTok, Bilibili and Redbook platforms ultimately enrolling a total of 300 videos. The quality of the content was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tools. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by Cohen’s κ. Correlation and Poisson regression analyses were performed. Statistically, the quality and reliability of lung cancer videos hosted on Bilibili were higher than those on TikTok and Redbook (all P < 0.05). Regarding video sources, the GQS scores of videos uploaded by news agencies were significantly lower than those of videos posted by science communications and for-profit organizations in the field of lung cancer (all P < 0.05). In terms of video content, videos focusing on late symptoms showed lower scores than those on early signals. Inter-rater reliability was substantial (κ = 0.82 for GQS, κ = 0.80 for mDISCERN). No video variables significantly predicted quality scores in regression models. The present study demonstrates that the quality of lung cancer-related health information short videos on three major Chinese platforms, TikTok, Bilibili and Redbook, is generally suboptimal. However, videos uploaded by health professionals were found to be relatively reliable, particularly in terms of content comprehensiveness and scientific rigor. The public needs to critically judge the credibility of medical short videos before applying relevant health knowledge to self-management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16807-4
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality and reliability of lung cancer–related short videos in China: a cross-sectional content analysis study

Yurou Liu, Peini Xue, Liang Gong, Yifeng Wang et al.
BMC Cancer
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Quality and reliability of lung cancer–related short videos in China: a cross-sectional content analysis study

Yurou Liu, Peini Xue, Liang Gong, Yifeng Wang, Faguang Jin, Jiaying Gao, Minzhen Zhu
article en

Abstract

Lung cancer has emerged as one of the most prevalent diseases in China in recent years, leading to heightened public concerns regarding its substantial disease burden. Short videos on lung cancer are disseminated through TikTok, Bilibili and Redbook apps, which have become an easily accessible source of seeking health information. However, the informational quality, accuracy and reliability of short videos remain systematically unexamined. In January 1st, 2026, we screened the lung cancer-related videos and assessed the basic information presented in them on TikTok, Bilibili and Redbook platforms ultimately enrolling a total of 300 videos. The quality of the content was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tools. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by Cohen’s κ. Correlation and Poisson regression analyses were performed. Statistically, the quality and reliability of lung cancer videos hosted on Bilibili were higher than those on TikTok and Redbook (all P < 0.05). Regarding video sources, the GQS scores of videos uploaded by news agencies were significantly lower than those of videos posted by science communications and for-profit organizations in the field of lung cancer (all P < 0.05). In terms of video content, videos focusing on late symptoms showed lower scores than those on early signals. Inter-rater reliability was substantial (κ = 0.82 for GQS, κ = 0.80 for mDISCERN). No video variables significantly predicted quality scores in regression models. The present study demonstrates that the quality of lung cancer-related health information short videos on three major Chinese platforms, TikTok, Bilibili and Redbook, is generally suboptimal. However, videos uploaded by health professionals were found to be relatively reliable, particularly in terms of content comprehensiveness and scientific rigor. The public needs to critically judge the credibility of medical short videos before applying relevant health knowledge to self-management.

BMC Cancer
Army Medical University (CN), Southwest Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Tang Du Hospital (CN), Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Air Force Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.