Social Determinants of Healthcare Access: Horizontal Inequity in Rehabilitation Utilization and the Limits of Care in Mediating the Income–Depression Gradient in Türkiye

Background/Objectives: Structural inequalities in access to healthcare persist even within systems that have achieved near-universal coverage, reflecting the enduring influence of social determinants of health on service utilization. This study examines horizontal inequity in rehabilitation and specialist care in Türkiye and investigates whether access inequality mediates the well-documented income–depression gradient. Methods: Analyzing the nationally representative 2022 Türkiye Health Survey (adults aged ≥15; N = 22,742), we employed Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to construct people-centered, multidimensional bodily burden profiles, and assessed need-adjusted access using survey-weighted logistic regression, Erreygers-corrected concentration-index decomposition, Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA), and restricted cubic splines, with measurement-invariance and classification-uncertainty sensitivity analyses. Statistical mediation was examined with natural-effect models and E-value sensitivity analysis. Results: Although the system demonstrated responsiveness to need—78.8% of the highest-burden profile accessed specialist services—only 13.7% of this same group reached dedicated physiotherapy or rehabilitation, revealing a profound structural bottleneck in care coordination for marginalized populations with the greatest functional impairment. A persistent pro-rich gradient was confirmed by an Erreygers-corrected concentration index of 0.058 (95% CI 0.043–0.072), driven additively by income and education. Access did not mediate the income–depression pathway (natural indirect effect OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.0003–1.002). Conclusions: The mental health burden of low income operates through pathways that equitable healthcare access alone cannot address. These findings call for macroeconomic and people-centered health system reforms—including direct physiotherapy access, transportation subsidies, and social protection interventions—to advance health equity in rehabilitation utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14162658
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Determinants of Healthcare Access: Horizontal Inequity in Rehabilitation Utilization and the Limits of Care in Mediating the Income–Depression Gradient in Türkiye

Derya Azim, Salim Yılmaz, Sümeyra GÜNDEM, Ecenur Aydemir et al.
Healthcare
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Social Determinants of Healthcare Access: Horizontal Inequity in Rehabilitation Utilization and the Limits of Care in Mediating the Income–Depression Gradient in Türkiye

Derya Azim, Salim Yılmaz, Sümeyra GÜNDEM, Ecenur Aydemir, Sevde Betül Yiğit, MUHAMMED EMRE GÜVEY
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Structural inequalities in access to healthcare persist even within systems that have achieved near-universal coverage, reflecting the enduring influence of social determinants of health on service utilization. This study examines horizontal inequity in rehabilitation and specialist care in Türkiye and investigates whether access inequality mediates the well-documented income–depression gradient. Methods: Analyzing the nationally representative 2022 Türkiye Health Survey (adults aged ≥15; N = 22,742), we employed Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to construct people-centered, multidimensional bodily burden profiles, and assessed need-adjusted access using survey-weighted logistic regression, Erreygers-corrected concentration-index decomposition, Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA), and restricted cubic splines, with measurement-invariance and classification-uncertainty sensitivity analyses. Statistical mediation was examined with natural-effect models and E-value sensitivity analysis. Results: Although the system demonstrated responsiveness to need—78.8% of the highest-burden profile accessed specialist services—only 13.7% of this same group reached dedicated physiotherapy or rehabilitation, revealing a profound structural bottleneck in care coordination for marginalized populations with the greatest functional impairment. A persistent pro-rich gradient was confirmed by an Erreygers-corrected concentration index of 0.058 (95% CI 0.043–0.072), driven additively by income and education. Access did not mediate the income–depression pathway (natural indirect effect OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.0003–1.002). Conclusions: The mental health burden of low income operates through pathways that equitable healthcare access alone cannot address. These findings call for macroeconomic and people-centered health system reforms—including direct physiotherapy access, transportation subsidies, and social protection interventions—to advance health equity in rehabilitation utilization.

HealthcareVol. 14(16)
Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University (TR), Kent Hastanesi (TR), Istanbul Arel University (TR)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.