Development of a Novel Modular Footwear Setup for Testing the Isolated Biomechanical Effects of Footwear Features

ABSTRACT Background In footwear science, the effect of specific design features on biomechanical parameters during common motor tasks is often confounded by simultaneous changes in other shoe conditions. This study proposes and assesses the repeatability of a new tool, namely the Modular Footwear Setup (MFS), to assess the effects of midsole modifications on lower‐limb joint kinematics and in‐shoe pressure measurements. Methods The MFS uses a micro‐hook‐and‐loop fastening system and a custom alignment device to enable fast and reliable midsole attachment/detachment to/from the upper. Repeatability of joint kinematics and in‐shoe pressure parameters was tested in 10 healthy participants (5M, 5F; age = 33.2 ± 9.2 yrs; BMI = 21.5 ± 2.8 kg*m −2 ) across three walking sessions. The effect of the MFS fixation method was assessed by comparing relevant biomechanical outcomes to those of a control shoe featuring the same upper and midsole. Comfort‐related outcomes were reported using a visual analog scale. Results Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis did not identify significant differences in joint kinematics between conditions. No significant differences were observed in pressure parameters at any foot region between MFS and control, except for the peak pressure at the rearfoot. The MFS demonstrated good‐to‐excellent inter‐session repeatability (ICC 0.84–0.97) for mean and peak pressure. Participants reported similar levels of comfort and stability in both shoes. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that the MFS has the potential to be a reliable tool for evaluating the effects of midsole features on relevant biomechanical parameters. This modular approach may improve data‐driven footwear design by improving the consistency of biomechanical measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70203
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Novel Modular Footwear Setup for Testing the Isolated Biomechanical Effects of Footwear Features

Alberto Leardini, Lisa Berti, Kamran Shakir, Paolo Caravaggi et al.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Development of a Novel Modular Footwear Setup for Testing the Isolated Biomechanical Effects of Footwear Features

Alberto Leardini, Lisa Berti, Kamran Shakir, Paolo Caravaggi, Giulia Rogati, Hadi Sarlak, Giorgia Sartorato
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background In footwear science, the effect of specific design features on biomechanical parameters during common motor tasks is often confounded by simultaneous changes in other shoe conditions. This study proposes and assesses the repeatability of a new tool, namely the Modular Footwear Setup (MFS), to assess the effects of midsole modifications on lower‐limb joint kinematics and in‐shoe pressure measurements. Methods The MFS uses a micro‐hook‐and‐loop fastening system and a custom alignment device to enable fast and reliable midsole attachment/detachment to/from the upper. Repeatability of joint kinematics and in‐shoe pressure parameters was tested in 10 healthy participants (5M, 5F; age = 33.2 ± 9.2 yrs; BMI = 21.5 ± 2.8 kg*m −2 ) across three walking sessions. The effect of the MFS fixation method was assessed by comparing relevant biomechanical outcomes to those of a control shoe featuring the same upper and midsole. Comfort‐related outcomes were reported using a visual analog scale. Results Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis did not identify significant differences in joint kinematics between conditions. No significant differences were observed in pressure parameters at any foot region between MFS and control, except for the peak pressure at the rearfoot. The MFS demonstrated good‐to‐excellent inter‐session repeatability (ICC 0.84–0.97) for mean and peak pressure. Participants reported similar levels of comfort and stability in both shoes. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that the MFS has the potential to be a reliable tool for evaluating the effects of midsole features on relevant biomechanical parameters. This modular approach may improve data‐driven footwear design by improving the consistency of biomechanical measurements.

Journal of Foot and Ankle ResearchVol. 19(3)
AULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana (IT), Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.