Assessing Student Strengths and Risks: Updating a Risk and Needs Assessment for High School Students

The Washington Assessment of the Risks and Needs of Students (WARNS) is used to identify student risks and needs associated with absenteeism and truancy. This study evaluated an updated factor structure for the WARNS, aiming to enhance its utility for identifying both student risks and strengths. Confirmatory factor analysis compared several models, including a symmetrical bifactor model and a two-factor higher-order model distinguishing Risk and Strengths dimensions. The two-factor higher-order and the bifactor models were preferred models, supporting scoring validity and different aspects of interpretation and use. Reliability analyses indicated high internal consistency and moderate test–retest reliability across domains. The revised WARNS structure enables practitioners to identify areas of concern and domains of strength, facilitating more targeted strategies and conversations with students. The dual-factor framework aligns with contemporary models of positive youth development and supports holistic, student-centered practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829261479973
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Student Strengths and Risks: Updating a Risk and Needs Assessment for High School Students

Brian F. French, Paul S. Strand, Laura Pires Gifford
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Assessing Student Strengths and Risks: Updating a Risk and Needs Assessment for High School Students

Brian F. French, Paul S. Strand, Laura Pires Gifford
article en

Abstract

The Washington Assessment of the Risks and Needs of Students (WARNS) is used to identify student risks and needs associated with absenteeism and truancy. This study evaluated an updated factor structure for the WARNS, aiming to enhance its utility for identifying both student risks and strengths. Confirmatory factor analysis compared several models, including a symmetrical bifactor model and a two-factor higher-order model distinguishing Risk and Strengths dimensions. The two-factor higher-order and the bifactor models were preferred models, supporting scoring validity and different aspects of interpretation and use. Reliability analyses indicated high internal consistency and moderate test–retest reliability across domains. The revised WARNS structure enables practitioners to identify areas of concern and domains of strength, facilitating more targeted strategies and conversations with students. The dual-factor framework aligns with contemporary models of positive youth development and supports holistic, student-centered practices.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Methodist University (US)
U.S. Department of Education, Washington State University, Institute of Education Sciences
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.