Does the hedging strategy change Türkiye’s strategic culture? An evaluation in the context of the SCO and BRICS discourse

This article examines whether Turkey’s recent hedging practices signify a transformation in its strategic culture or merely a tactical adjustment in foreign policy. Building on the literature on strategic hedging and strategic culture, it develops an analytical framework linking foreign policy behaviour to cultural continuity and change. The study situates Turkey comparatively among middle powers and analyzes post-2016 developments, including relations with NATO, Russia, China, and institutional discourses on SCO and BRICS. It argues that Turkey’s pursuit of strategic autonomy reflects hedging behaviour driven by systemic uncertainty, domestic political dynamics, and evolving defence capabilities. However, rather than replacing Turkey’s Western-oriented republican tradition, hedging has reinforced an existing imperial strand within Turkish strategic culture while maintaining structural dependence on Western institutions. The findings suggest that Turkey’s foreign policy exhibits adaptive continuity: strategic culture constrains radical reorientation, even as hedging expands tactical flexibility in an increasingly multipolar order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2026.2721759
Primary Topic
Turkey's Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the hedging strategy change Türkiye’s strategic culture? An evaluation in the context of the SCO and BRICS discourse

Göktürk Tüysüzoğlu
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Turkey's Politics and Society
article

Does the hedging strategy change Türkiye’s strategic culture? An evaluation in the context of the SCO and BRICS discourse

Göktürk Tüysüzoğlu
article en

Abstract

This article examines whether Turkey’s recent hedging practices signify a transformation in its strategic culture or merely a tactical adjustment in foreign policy. Building on the literature on strategic hedging and strategic culture, it develops an analytical framework linking foreign policy behaviour to cultural continuity and change. The study situates Turkey comparatively among middle powers and analyzes post-2016 developments, including relations with NATO, Russia, China, and institutional discourses on SCO and BRICS. It argues that Turkey’s pursuit of strategic autonomy reflects hedging behaviour driven by systemic uncertainty, domestic political dynamics, and evolving defence capabilities. However, rather than replacing Turkey’s Western-oriented republican tradition, hedging has reinforced an existing imperial strand within Turkish strategic culture while maintaining structural dependence on Western institutions. The findings suggest that Turkey’s foreign policy exhibits adaptive continuity: strategic culture constrains radical reorientation, even as hedging expands tactical flexibility in an increasingly multipolar order.

Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Giresun University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Turkey's Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.