A Correlation-Decoupled Interval Belief Rule Base for Interpretable Cross-Condition Bearing Fault Diagnosis

Cross-condition bearing fault diagnosis requires models that remain reliable under load-induced distribution shifts while providing transparent and traceable reasoning. Conventional belief rule bases (BRBs) may repeatedly use correlated vibration evidence during inference, and their Cartesian-product rule construction can rapidly increase rule-base complexity. This study proposes a correlation-decoupled interval belief rule base (CD-IBRB) for cross-condition bearing fault diagnosis. Seven diagnostically relevant time-domain features are selected using XGBoost and transformed into a less-correlated feature space through a Kendall-rank-correlation-guided matrix estimated exclusively from the source training data. Attribute-wise referential points and intervals are then constructed from the transformed training attributes, allowing the rule base to grow additively rather than combinatorially. Initial belief distributions are obtained from interval-level class distributions. The projection covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (P-CMA-ES) jointly optimizes the belief degrees, rule reliabilities, and rule weights, while evidential reasoning aggregates the activated interval rules to produce the final diagnostic result. In the primary cross-load bearing experiment, CD-IBRB achieved an accuracy of 0.9702 and a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.9703. It outperformed the strongest BRB variant and data-driven baseline by 7.70 and 6.10 percentage points in accuracy, respectively. Ablation experiments confirmed that removing parameter optimization or attribute decoupling reduced accuracy to 0.9053 and 0.9303, respectively. Additional cross-load and noise-injection experiments further demonstrated the stability of CD-IBRB under load shifts and input disturbances. Across five public multiclass datasets, CD-IBRB achieved a mean accuracy of 0.9004 and consistently outperformed the compared BRB variants. These results demonstrate that CD-IBRB provides a compact, uncertainty-aware, and traceable framework for cross-condition bearing fault diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e28080939
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Correlation-Decoupled Interval Belief Rule Base for Interpretable Cross-Condition Bearing Fault Diagnosis

Ning Li, Xingchi Yan, Yan Yu
Entropy
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
article

A Correlation-Decoupled Interval Belief Rule Base for Interpretable Cross-Condition Bearing Fault Diagnosis

Ning Li, Xingchi Yan, Yan Yu
article en

Abstract

Cross-condition bearing fault diagnosis requires models that remain reliable under load-induced distribution shifts while providing transparent and traceable reasoning. Conventional belief rule bases (BRBs) may repeatedly use correlated vibration evidence during inference, and their Cartesian-product rule construction can rapidly increase rule-base complexity. This study proposes a correlation-decoupled interval belief rule base (CD-IBRB) for cross-condition bearing fault diagnosis. Seven diagnostically relevant time-domain features are selected using XGBoost and transformed into a less-correlated feature space through a Kendall-rank-correlation-guided matrix estimated exclusively from the source training data. Attribute-wise referential points and intervals are then constructed from the transformed training attributes, allowing the rule base to grow additively rather than combinatorially. Initial belief distributions are obtained from interval-level class distributions. The projection covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (P-CMA-ES) jointly optimizes the belief degrees, rule reliabilities, and rule weights, while evidential reasoning aggregates the activated interval rules to produce the final diagnostic result. In the primary cross-load bearing experiment, CD-IBRB achieved an accuracy of 0.9702 and a macro-averaged F1 score of 0.9703. It outperformed the strongest BRB variant and data-driven baseline by 7.70 and 6.10 percentage points in accuracy, respectively. Ablation experiments confirmed that removing parameter optimization or attribute decoupling reduced accuracy to 0.9053 and 0.9303, respectively. Additional cross-load and noise-injection experiments further demonstrated the stability of CD-IBRB under load shifts and input disturbances. Across five public multiclass datasets, CD-IBRB achieved a mean accuracy of 0.9004 and consistently outperformed the compared BRB variants. These results demonstrate that CD-IBRB provides a compact, uncertainty-aware, and traceable framework for cross-condition bearing fault diagnosis.

EntropyVol. 28(8)
Harbin Normal University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.