Improving Inclusion of Ethnically Diverse and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Populations in Pain Research: A Comprehensive Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations

Limited inclusion of ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in pain research undermines external validity, generalizability, and equity. This comprehensive review synthesized evidence on effective strategies to recruit and retain these populations in pain studies. We searched Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL (12 April 2025) and included studies in which ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged participants comprised ≥75% of the sample. Quantitative data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses of proportions, with prespecified subgroup analyses, and qualitative findings were integrated through thematic synthesis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Eighteen studies (n = 4611; 11 experimental, 5 observational, 2 qualitative), primarily from the United States and involving chronic pain, met inclusion criteria. Overall enrollment among ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups was 37% (95% CI 18–58%), with significantly higher enrollment in observational studies (84%, 95% CI 78–90%) than in experimental trials (22%, 95% CI 10–36%; p < 0.001). Overall retention was 77% (95% CI 64–88%) and did not differ significantly by study design. Statewide disease-clinic networks, purposive community-leader engagement, and snowball sampling produced the highest enrollment, whereas medical-record screening yielded the lowest enrollment but the highest retention. Compensation and reminder strategies were similarly effective for retention. Thematic synthesis highlighted trust, culturally and linguistically tailored communication, hybrid and flexible visit schedules, transportation assistance, and clinician engagement as key facilitators. GRADE certainty was low for enrollment and moderate for retention. Community-engaged recruitment strategies, clinician referrals, culturally tailored materials, hybrid procedures, and modest incentives can substantially improve participation of ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in pain research. Standardized CONSORT-style reporting of recruitment/retention flowcharts according to strategy and ethnicity/socioeconomic status is essential to refine evidence-based strategies in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23081091
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Inclusion of Ethnically Diverse and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Populations in Pain Research: A Comprehensive Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations

Kevin Pacheco‐Barrios, Raúl Ferrer‐Peña, Paulo S. de Melo, Robin E. Heemels et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Improving Inclusion of Ethnically Diverse and Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Populations in Pain Research: A Comprehensive Review and Evidence-Based Recommendations

Kevin Pacheco‐Barrios, Raúl Ferrer‐Peña, Paulo S. de Melo, Robin E. Heemels, Carla Pastora-Sesín, Joao Victor Ribeiro, Erick Barrientos-Ventura, Lucas Camargo, Jaime Pacheco-Neyra, Niels Pacheco-Barrios, Equity in Pain ResearchWorking Group (EPR-WG), Allison Kim, Alba Navarro-Flores, Silvia Di-Bonaventura
article en

Abstract

Limited inclusion of ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in pain research undermines external validity, generalizability, and equity. This comprehensive review synthesized evidence on effective strategies to recruit and retain these populations in pain studies. We searched Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL (12 April 2025) and included studies in which ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged participants comprised ≥75% of the sample. Quantitative data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses of proportions, with prespecified subgroup analyses, and qualitative findings were integrated through thematic synthesis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Eighteen studies (n = 4611; 11 experimental, 5 observational, 2 qualitative), primarily from the United States and involving chronic pain, met inclusion criteria. Overall enrollment among ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups was 37% (95% CI 18–58%), with significantly higher enrollment in observational studies (84%, 95% CI 78–90%) than in experimental trials (22%, 95% CI 10–36%; p < 0.001). Overall retention was 77% (95% CI 64–88%) and did not differ significantly by study design. Statewide disease-clinic networks, purposive community-leader engagement, and snowball sampling produced the highest enrollment, whereas medical-record screening yielded the lowest enrollment but the highest retention. Compensation and reminder strategies were similarly effective for retention. Thematic synthesis highlighted trust, culturally and linguistically tailored communication, hybrid and flexible visit schedules, transportation assistance, and clinician engagement as key facilitators. GRADE certainty was low for enrollment and moderate for retention. Community-engaged recruitment strategies, clinician referrals, culturally tailored materials, hybrid procedures, and modest incentives can substantially improve participation of ethnically diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in pain research. Standardized CONSORT-style reporting of recruitment/retention flowcharts according to strategy and ethnicity/socioeconomic status is essential to refine evidence-based strategies in the future.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 23(8)
Harvard University (US), National University of Cajamarca (PE), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (PE), Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US), LMU Klinikum (DE), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Unidades Centrales Científico-Técnicas (ES), Comunidad de Madrid (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.