Real-world retinal vasculitis events reported with FDA-approved intravitreal anti-VEGF and complement inhibitor agents: an analysis of FAERS data

PURPOSE: To analyze real-world Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data for retinal vasculitis associated with approved intravitreal (IVT) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and complement inhibitors in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective study used the publicly available FAERS database to identify serious adverse events related to IVT anti-VEGF and complement inhibitor agents reported between January 2020 and December 2025. Reports for brolucizumab, faricimab, aflibercept, ranibizumab, pegcetacoplan, and avacincaptad pegol were analyzed, with data for aflibercept and ranibizumab also reviewed from 2010-2019. Events were filtered to include only those linked exclusively to a single agent. RVAEs were identified using broad search terms related to vasculitis, while vascular occlusions without inflammation were excluded. RESULTS: FAERS data from January-2010 to December-2025 showed reported RVAEs across all included intravitreal therapies, with increased reporting after 2019. From January-2020 to December-2025, 554 RVAEs were identified among anti-VEGF reference products and complement inhibitors. Anti-VEGF reference products accounted for 485 reports (87.5%) and complement inhibitors for 69 (12.5%). Brolucizumab accounted for the largest proportion (56.1%; 311/554), followed by faricimab (16.4%; 91/554), pegcetacoplan (11.9%; 66/554), aflibercept 2 mg (8.7%; 48/554), aflibercept 8 mg (4.2%; 23/554), ranibizumab (2.2%; 12/554), and avacincaptad pegol (0.5%; 3/554). Separate biosimilar analysis identified one aflibercept biosimilar RVAE and no ranibizumab biosimilar RVAEs during this updated study period overall. CONCLUSIONS: FAERS reporting identified RVAEs across included intravitreal therapies, but cannot establish incidence, causality, or comparative risk, underscoring the need for vigilant reporting and ongoing post-marketing safety surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Retina
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004980
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world retinal vasculitis events reported with FDA-approved intravitreal anti-VEGF and complement inhibitor agents: an analysis of FAERS data

Ashraya Nayaka, Guruprasad B, Jay Chhablani, Elham Sadeghi
Retina
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Real-world retinal vasculitis events reported with FDA-approved intravitreal anti-VEGF and complement inhibitor agents: an analysis of FAERS data

Ashraya Nayaka, Guruprasad B, Jay Chhablani, Elham Sadeghi
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze real-world Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data for retinal vasculitis associated with approved intravitreal (IVT) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and complement inhibitors in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective study used the publicly available FAERS database to identify serious adverse events related to IVT anti-VEGF and complement inhibitor agents reported between January 2020 and December 2025. Reports for brolucizumab, faricimab, aflibercept, ranibizumab, pegcetacoplan, and avacincaptad pegol were analyzed, with data for aflibercept and ranibizumab also reviewed from 2010-2019. Events were filtered to include only those linked exclusively to a single agent. RVAEs were identified using broad search terms related to vasculitis, while vascular occlusions without inflammation were excluded. RESULTS: FAERS data from January-2010 to December-2025 showed reported RVAEs across all included intravitreal therapies, with increased reporting after 2019. From January-2020 to December-2025, 554 RVAEs were identified among anti-VEGF reference products and complement inhibitors. Anti-VEGF reference products accounted for 485 reports (87.5%) and complement inhibitors for 69 (12.5%). Brolucizumab accounted for the largest proportion (56.1%; 311/554), followed by faricimab (16.4%; 91/554), pegcetacoplan (11.9%; 66/554), aflibercept 2 mg (8.7%; 48/554), aflibercept 8 mg (4.2%; 23/554), ranibizumab (2.2%; 12/554), and avacincaptad pegol (0.5%; 3/554). Separate biosimilar analysis identified one aflibercept biosimilar RVAE and no ranibizumab biosimilar RVAEs during this updated study period overall. CONCLUSIONS: FAERS reporting identified RVAEs across included intravitreal therapies, but cannot establish incidence, causality, or comparative risk, underscoring the need for vigilant reporting and ongoing post-marketing safety surveillance.

Retina
University of Pittsburgh (US), Oldham Council (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Real-world retinal vasculitis events reported with FDA-approved intravitreal anti-VEGF and complement inhibitor agents: an analysis of FAERS data — Ashraya Nayaka, Guruprasad B, et al. · Retina (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS