Towards inclusive prosperity: comparative analysis of Indigenous procurement policies in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand

Indigenous procurement is widely promoted as an instrument of economic reconciliation, yet headline gains often mask limited transformational impact. Applying McCrudden’s social procurement framework, we conduct a systematic cross-national comparison of identity-specific procurement architectures across Canada, Australia, and Aotearoa New Zealand. We show that contract values cluster heavily within major metropolitan hubs and narrow industry sectors, leaving remote and early-stage community enterprises marginalized. Furthermore, persistent cross-national data gaps and aggregated reporting conceal these structural inequities while enabling policy distortions like fronting. We recommend structural reforms including regional benchmarks and independent auditing to align procurement with genuine Indigenous economic sovereignty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Management Review
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2026.2720045
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards inclusive prosperity: comparative analysis of Indigenous procurement policies in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand

Rick Colbourne, Irene Henriques, Ana María Peredo, Christian Eva et al.
Public Management Review
Public Procurement and Policy
article

Towards inclusive prosperity: comparative analysis of Indigenous procurement policies in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand

Rick Colbourne, Irene Henriques, Ana María Peredo, Christian Eva, Barbara Allen, Jesse Pirini
article en

Abstract

Indigenous procurement is widely promoted as an instrument of economic reconciliation, yet headline gains often mask limited transformational impact. Applying McCrudden’s social procurement framework, we conduct a systematic cross-national comparison of identity-specific procurement architectures across Canada, Australia, and Aotearoa New Zealand. We show that contract values cluster heavily within major metropolitan hubs and narrow industry sectors, leaving remote and early-stage community enterprises marginalized. Furthermore, persistent cross-national data gaps and aggregated reporting conceal these structural inequities while enabling policy distortions like fronting. We recommend structural reforms including regional benchmarks and independent auditing to align procurement with genuine Indigenous economic sovereignty.

Public Management Review
Australian National University (AU), University of Ottawa (CA), York University (CA), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Carleton University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.