Waiting as governance: Temporal extraction and affective control in Pakistani institutions

This article interrogates bureaucratic delay in Pakistan as a mode of governance, drawing on auto-ethnographic encounters of the first author across institutional sites, including university credentialing offices, the Higher Education Commission (HEC) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA). The study systematically examines redundant verification, fragmented procedures and prolonged waiting, which waste citizens’ time. Situating these practices within post-colonial theory and critical scholarship on temporality, the article argues that bureaucratic delay operates as a form of temporal extraction through which authority is enacted, compliance is cultivated and citizenship is differentially experienced. The analysis demonstrates that colonial administrative residues such as documentary suspicion and repetitive verification persist within contemporary governance, while being reconfigured through neoliberal rationalities that digitise delay, commodify urgency and disperse institutional accountability. Bureaucratic time theft thus emerges as a hybrid temporal regime that governs not through overt exclusion but through endurance, uncertainty and affective labour. We have foregrounded time as a political and moral resource to advance the concept of temporal dignity as integral to democratic citizenship, and contend that decolonising governance requires confronting the everyday temporal practices through which post-colonial states continue to discipline, extract and govern their populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Time & Society
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463x261480056
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waiting as governance: Temporal extraction and affective control in Pakistani institutions

Nabeel Ali Khan, Hamza Israr
Time & Society
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Waiting as governance: Temporal extraction and affective control in Pakistani institutions

Nabeel Ali Khan, Hamza Israr
article en

Abstract

This article interrogates bureaucratic delay in Pakistan as a mode of governance, drawing on auto-ethnographic encounters of the first author across institutional sites, including university credentialing offices, the Higher Education Commission (HEC) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA). The study systematically examines redundant verification, fragmented procedures and prolonged waiting, which waste citizens’ time. Situating these practices within post-colonial theory and critical scholarship on temporality, the article argues that bureaucratic delay operates as a form of temporal extraction through which authority is enacted, compliance is cultivated and citizenship is differentially experienced. The analysis demonstrates that colonial administrative residues such as documentary suspicion and repetitive verification persist within contemporary governance, while being reconfigured through neoliberal rationalities that digitise delay, commodify urgency and disperse institutional accountability. Bureaucratic time theft thus emerges as a hybrid temporal regime that governs not through overt exclusion but through endurance, uncertainty and affective labour. We have foregrounded time as a political and moral resource to advance the concept of temporal dignity as integral to democratic citizenship, and contend that decolonising governance requires confronting the everyday temporal practices through which post-colonial states continue to discipline, extract and govern their populations.

Time & Society
Quaid-i-Azam University (PK), Keele University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.