Technology-Enabled Interventions for Preventing and Responding to Elder Abuse: A Review of the Current Evidence

This scoping review consolidates existing technology-enabled interventions for preventing and responding to abuse of older people (AOP). Studies reporting original, evaluated interventions in which technology delivered over 50% of the content or enabled coordination were included. Ten primary databases, four gray literature sources, and two artificial intelligence‑assisted platforms were searched for articles published between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2024. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using JBI appraisal tools. Data were extracted by one reviewer and independently verified by a second using a standardized charting form. Of 46,195 records, 17 studies describing 14 technology-enabled interventions were included, targeting general ( n = 11), financial ( n = 2), or sexual ( n = 1) AOP. Nine were professional training programs, and five were direct AOP prevention interventions, comprising primary ( n = 1), secondary ( n = 2), and tertiary prevention ( n = 2). Technologies employed were: Web-based coordination portals ( n = 2) and tech-assisted individual interventions ( n = 12), such as e-learning and virtual reality. Although positive results for intermediate outcomes (e.g., service provision) were observed, evidence of alleviation of AOP occurrence and improvement of victim health remains limited. Current evidence is thus insufficient to recommend the adoption of technological interventions in response to AOP. We recommend (a) advancing scientific rigor by prioritizing randomized controlled trials with longitudinal follow-up, (b) employing objective, verified indicators for abuse victimization and victim health as outcome measures, and (c) establishing a standard evaluation framework to enable cross-study synthesis. This review was registered on PROSPERO (no. CRD420251139047).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trauma Violence & Abuse
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380261467488
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technology-Enabled Interventions for Preventing and Responding to Elder Abuse: A Review of the Current Evidence

Minying He, Zhuopeng Yu, Elsie Yan
Trauma Violence & Abuse
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

Technology-Enabled Interventions for Preventing and Responding to Elder Abuse: A Review of the Current Evidence

Minying He, Zhuopeng Yu, Elsie Yan
article en

Abstract

This scoping review consolidates existing technology-enabled interventions for preventing and responding to abuse of older people (AOP). Studies reporting original, evaluated interventions in which technology delivered over 50% of the content or enabled coordination were included. Ten primary databases, four gray literature sources, and two artificial intelligence‑assisted platforms were searched for articles published between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2024. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using JBI appraisal tools. Data were extracted by one reviewer and independently verified by a second using a standardized charting form. Of 46,195 records, 17 studies describing 14 technology-enabled interventions were included, targeting general ( n = 11), financial ( n = 2), or sexual ( n = 1) AOP. Nine were professional training programs, and five were direct AOP prevention interventions, comprising primary ( n = 1), secondary ( n = 2), and tertiary prevention ( n = 2). Technologies employed were: Web-based coordination portals ( n = 2) and tech-assisted individual interventions ( n = 12), such as e-learning and virtual reality. Although positive results for intermediate outcomes (e.g., service provision) were observed, evidence of alleviation of AOP occurrence and improvement of victim health remains limited. Current evidence is thus insufficient to recommend the adoption of technological interventions in response to AOP. We recommend (a) advancing scientific rigor by prioritizing randomized controlled trials with longitudinal follow-up, (b) employing objective, verified indicators for abuse victimization and victim health as outcome measures, and (c) establishing a standard evaluation framework to enable cross-study synthesis. This review was registered on PROSPERO (no. CRD420251139047).

Trauma Violence & Abuse
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.