MODEL ADOPTION #1277: REJECT — LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Pool density HIGH (>=90) — improves win rate from 31.7% to 33. — E8 Intelligence Research

DECISION: REJECT ELEMENT: The filter "pool density >= 90" is not a concrete, testable edge compatible with E8 geometry timing. It is a statistical artifact from a backtest window (n=1330) with no demonstrated causal link to the rhythm logic of E8-node/Gods-Clock or the FADE polarity edge. The 1.6pp win-rate improvement is marginal and likely overfit to a specific market regime. The filter rejects trades based on a non-geometric, non-temporal condition, which violates the core premise of E8: timing and polarity are primary, density is secondary at best. EXPECTED IMPACT: Negligible to negative. Win-rate may tick up slightly (0–1pp) but trade count drops significantly, reducing total net profit. The filter cuts high-reward, low-density setups that may be the source of outsized gains. Over 3–6 months, the filter's selectivity will likely decay as pool density distributions shift, leading to worse performance than the unfiltered baseline. RISK: Overfitting to a specific backtest window. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22039968
Primary Topic
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

MODEL ADOPTION #1277: REJECT — LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Pool density HIGH (>=90) — improves win rate from 31.7% to 33. — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
preprint

MODEL ADOPTION #1277: REJECT — LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Pool density HIGH (>=90) — improves win rate from 31.7% to 33. — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin
preprint en

Abstract

DECISION: REJECT ELEMENT: The filter "pool density >= 90" is not a concrete, testable edge compatible with E8 geometry timing. It is a statistical artifact from a backtest window (n=1330) with no demonstrated causal link to the rhythm logic of E8-node/Gods-Clock or the FADE polarity edge. The 1.6pp win-rate improvement is marginal and likely overfit to a specific market regime. The filter rejects trades based on a non-geometric, non-temporal condition, which violates the core premise of E8: timing and polarity are primary, density is secondary at best. EXPECTED IMPACT: Negligible to negative. Win-rate may tick up slightly (0–1pp) but trade count drops significantly, reducing total net profit. The filter cuts high-reward, low-density setups that may be the source of outsized gains. Over 3–6 months, the filter's selectivity will likely decay as pool density distributions shift, leading to worse performance than the unfiltered baseline. RISK: Overfitting to a specific backtest window. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Decent work and economic growth
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MODEL ADOPTION #1277: REJECT — LEDGER BENCH: Apply filter: Pool density HIGH (>=90) — improves win rate from 31.7% to 33. — E8 Intelligence Research — Andrew Stewart Caldin · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS