Regulating Memory Use: Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity in Natural Tasks

Working memory (WM) capacity predicts a wide range of cognitive abilities, yet little is known about how individuals with different WM capacities regulate memory use during natural tasks in which memory use is voluntarily determined. To address this question, we conducted two experiments (N = 120) in which participants completed a copying task and a change-detection task. Experiment 1 manipulated sampling cost to increase reliance on internal memory storage, whereas Experiment 2 manipulated time pressure to increase demands for maintaining consistent memory use. Increasing sampling cost led participants to use more memory but did not make individual differences in WM capacity more apparent in mean memory usage. In contrast, time pressure revealed a reliable association between WM capacity and the consistency of memory usage across sampling episodes. Higher-capacity individuals exhibited more consistent memory use. These findings suggest that WM capacity shapes voluntary memory use not simply by increasing how much information people remember, but by influencing how consistently they regulate memory use under different task demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16081444
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating Memory Use: Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity in Natural Tasks

Mowei Shen, Xutao Zheng, Jifan Zhou, Hui Chen
Behavioral Sciences
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Regulating Memory Use: Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity in Natural Tasks

Mowei Shen, Xutao Zheng, Jifan Zhou, Hui Chen
article en

Abstract

Working memory (WM) capacity predicts a wide range of cognitive abilities, yet little is known about how individuals with different WM capacities regulate memory use during natural tasks in which memory use is voluntarily determined. To address this question, we conducted two experiments (N = 120) in which participants completed a copying task and a change-detection task. Experiment 1 manipulated sampling cost to increase reliance on internal memory storage, whereas Experiment 2 manipulated time pressure to increase demands for maintaining consistent memory use. Increasing sampling cost led participants to use more memory but did not make individual differences in WM capacity more apparent in mean memory usage. In contrast, time pressure revealed a reliable association between WM capacity and the consistency of memory usage across sampling episodes. Higher-capacity individuals exhibited more consistent memory use. These findings suggest that WM capacity shapes voluntary memory use not simply by increasing how much information people remember, but by influencing how consistently they regulate memory use under different task demands.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(8)
Zhejiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.