Maxillary sinus pneumatization in healthy dentate individuals: an overview of systematic reviews

Abstract Background Maxillary sinus pneumatization is a dynamic physiological process that alters the anatomical relationship between the sinus floor and posterior maxillary dentition. Excessive pneumatization can reduce alveolar bone height, complicating implant placement and increasing the need for sinus augmentation. Although widely investigated in edentulous and pathological conditions, evidence in healthy, dentate individuals remains limited. Objective To synthesise evidence from systematic reviews on the development, pneumatization, and volumetric variation of the maxillary sinus in healthy dentate individuals, and to assess the influence of age, gender, ethnicity, and geography. Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched up to 14 October 2025 using MeSH terms (“maxillary sinus pneumat*,” “maxillary sinus enlarge*,” “maxillary sinus develop*”). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dentate populations were included, while studies on pathology, edentulism, or surgical interventions were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, Glenny, JBI, CASP, and ROBIS tools. Reporting followed PRIOR and PRISMA2020 guidance for overviews. Corrected Covered Area (CCA) analysis was used to assess overlap between reviews. Results Six systematic reviews were included from 352 records. Overall methodological quality was high (mean compliance 90–93%). Adult sinus volumes ranged from 12–20 cm 3 , with consistent variation by age, gender, and ethnicity. Post-pubertal males exhibited 10–20% larger sinus volumes than females. Across 173 study occurrences (153 unique primary studies), the CCA was 2.6%, indicating minimal overlap. Conclusions Maxillary sinus morphology demonstrates substantial inter-individual variability driven by developmental and demographic factors. Despite high methodological quality, the current evidence base is largely descriptive and cross-sectional. No review identified definitive causal mechanisms or longitudinal evidence explaining sinus pneumatization, highlighting a critical gap for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09497-8
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maxillary sinus pneumatization in healthy dentate individuals: an overview of systematic reviews

Abdulmajeed Almuaddi, Ala Al‐Musawi, Manea Musa M. Alahmari, Rahul Tiwari et al.
BMC Oral Health
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

Maxillary sinus pneumatization in healthy dentate individuals: an overview of systematic reviews

Abdulmajeed Almuaddi, Ala Al‐Musawi, Manea Musa M. Alahmari, Rahul Tiwari, Vivekanand Kattimani, Shahabe Saquib Abullais, Khaled Salah Al Methin, Ali H. Al-Sabti
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Maxillary sinus pneumatization is a dynamic physiological process that alters the anatomical relationship between the sinus floor and posterior maxillary dentition. Excessive pneumatization can reduce alveolar bone height, complicating implant placement and increasing the need for sinus augmentation. Although widely investigated in edentulous and pathological conditions, evidence in healthy, dentate individuals remains limited. Objective To synthesise evidence from systematic reviews on the development, pneumatization, and volumetric variation of the maxillary sinus in healthy dentate individuals, and to assess the influence of age, gender, ethnicity, and geography. Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched up to 14 October 2025 using MeSH terms (“maxillary sinus pneumat*,” “maxillary sinus enlarge*,” “maxillary sinus develop*”). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dentate populations were included, while studies on pathology, edentulism, or surgical interventions were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, Glenny, JBI, CASP, and ROBIS tools. Reporting followed PRIOR and PRISMA2020 guidance for overviews. Corrected Covered Area (CCA) analysis was used to assess overlap between reviews. Results Six systematic reviews were included from 352 records. Overall methodological quality was high (mean compliance 90–93%). Adult sinus volumes ranged from 12–20 cm 3 , with consistent variation by age, gender, and ethnicity. Post-pubertal males exhibited 10–20% larger sinus volumes than females. Across 173 study occurrences (153 unique primary studies), the CCA was 2.6%, indicating minimal overlap. Conclusions Maxillary sinus morphology demonstrates substantial inter-individual variability driven by developmental and demographic factors. Despite high methodological quality, the current evidence base is largely descriptive and cross-sectional. No review identified definitive causal mechanisms or longitudinal evidence explaining sinus pneumatization, highlighting a critical gap for future research.

BMC Oral Health
Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital (KW), Manubhai Patel Dental College and Hospital (IN), Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune (IN), Ministry of Health (KW), King Khalid University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.