“We're supposed to serve the wider community.” A qualitative study exploring researchers’ perceptions and attitudes toward engagement in health research.

Background Public and community engagement has recently emerged as an important sphere of global health research. Recent engagement framework emphasises dialogic and participatory approaches that foster mutual learning between researchers and communities, reflecting a shift in research practice toward greater inclusivity, accountability, and responsiveness to societal needs. To contribute to evidence on the impact of engagement in health research, we conducted formative research to examine how researchers conceptualise engagement, perceive the value and impact of engagement, and navigate the practical challenges of implementation within complex research environments. Methods We used qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with researchers from four sites of Oxford University Clinical Research Units in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Nepal. Results Public and community engagement was valued by researchers in all career stages. Researchers’ understanding of engagement was often framed by the target audience, while their motivations encompassed both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Intrinsic motivations were linked to altruistic values, including a sense of researchers’ responsibility to make science accessible to the community, improve public knowledge and counter misinformation. Extrinsic motivations referred to the practical benefits of engagement for research, including increased institutional visibility, strengthened stakeholders trust, enhanced study recruitment and retention, and identified future research opportunities. Integration of engagement activities into health research were constrained by personal, institutional, and structural challenges, including low confidence in conducting activities, a lack of strategic engagement frameworks, limited funding, and a misalignment between community and researchers’ interests. Conclusion This study provides insights to inform the development of effective, context-appropriate strategies for embedding engagement within research systems. Continued investment in engagement infrastructure, methodological guidance, researcher support, and evaluation capacity, alongside establishing funding schemes for pre-study engagement could strengthen the integration of engagement across the research lifecycle and embed it more firmly within global health research practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.27406.1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“We're supposed to serve the wider community.” A qualitative study exploring researchers’ perceptions and attitudes toward engagement in health research.

Chi Le Phuong, Mary Chambers, Ashata Dahal, Ragil Dien et al.
Wellcome Open Research
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

“We're supposed to serve the wider community.” A qualitative study exploring researchers’ perceptions and attitudes toward engagement in health research.

Chi Le Phuong, Mary Chambers, Ashata Dahal, Ragil Dien, Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil, Katherine Rose, Alix Alicia Amelia Day
article en

Abstract

Background Public and community engagement has recently emerged as an important sphere of global health research. Recent engagement framework emphasises dialogic and participatory approaches that foster mutual learning between researchers and communities, reflecting a shift in research practice toward greater inclusivity, accountability, and responsiveness to societal needs. To contribute to evidence on the impact of engagement in health research, we conducted formative research to examine how researchers conceptualise engagement, perceive the value and impact of engagement, and navigate the practical challenges of implementation within complex research environments. Methods We used qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with researchers from four sites of Oxford University Clinical Research Units in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Nepal. Results Public and community engagement was valued by researchers in all career stages. Researchers’ understanding of engagement was often framed by the target audience, while their motivations encompassed both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Intrinsic motivations were linked to altruistic values, including a sense of researchers’ responsibility to make science accessible to the community, improve public knowledge and counter misinformation. Extrinsic motivations referred to the practical benefits of engagement for research, including increased institutional visibility, strengthened stakeholders trust, enhanced study recruitment and retention, and identified future research opportunities. Integration of engagement activities into health research were constrained by personal, institutional, and structural challenges, including low confidence in conducting activities, a lack of strategic engagement frameworks, limited funding, and a misalignment between community and researchers’ interests. Conclusion This study provides insights to inform the development of effective, context-appropriate strategies for embedding engagement within research systems. Continued investment in engagement infrastructure, methodological guidance, researcher support, and evaluation capacity, alongside establishing funding schemes for pre-study engagement could strengthen the integration of engagement across the research lifecycle and embed it more firmly within global health research practices.

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 11
Angkor Hospital for Children (KH), State University of Jakarta (ID), Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (VN), Kathmandu University (NP), Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (NP)
Wellcome Trust, University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.