Variation in antenatal anaemia guidelines across the NHS in the United Kingdom : A cross‐sectional study

Antenatal anaemia affects up to 30% of pregnant women in the United Kingdom and is a recognised clinical priority. National management guidance is published by the British Society of Haematology (BSH), but the extent to which local National Health Service (NHS) guidelines align with it is unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional document analysis of antenatal anaemia guidelines from 49 NHS sites across the United Kingdom, obtained through two national research programmes. Two reviewers independently extracted data on screening, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring, using the 2020 BSH guideline as the national reference standard. The included guidelines represented approximately 33% of annual UK births. Screening and diagnostic haemoglobin thresholds were broadly consistent with BSH guidance, whereas substantial variation was concentrated in treatment and monitoring: oral iron indications, dosing and duration; haemoglobin thresholds and clinical criteria for intravenous iron; and the timing, biomarkers and response definitions used after treatment. Ferritin thresholds, reassessment intervals and response criteria were frequently absent or divergent. Variation was greatest in domains where the underlying evidence base is least resolved. These findings characterise the nature and extent of guideline-level variation across NHS maternity care and identify priority areas for future research and national guideline development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Haematology
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70780
Primary Topic
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation in antenatal anaemia guidelines across the NHS in the United Kingdom : A cross‐sectional study

Sarah Bell, David Churchill, Simon Stanworth, Haddy K. S. Fye et al.
British Journal of Haematology
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
article

Variation in antenatal anaemia guidelines across the NHS in the United Kingdom : A cross‐sectional study

Sarah Bell, David Churchill, Simon Stanworth, Haddy K. S. Fye, Amy Elsmore, Peter Collins, L. de Lloyd, Sarah Haynes, Islam Balboula, William Parry-Smith, Rachel Collis
article en

Abstract

Antenatal anaemia affects up to 30% of pregnant women in the United Kingdom and is a recognised clinical priority. National management guidance is published by the British Society of Haematology (BSH), but the extent to which local National Health Service (NHS) guidelines align with it is unknown. We conducted a cross-sectional document analysis of antenatal anaemia guidelines from 49 NHS sites across the United Kingdom, obtained through two national research programmes. Two reviewers independently extracted data on screening, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring, using the 2020 BSH guideline as the national reference standard. The included guidelines represented approximately 33% of annual UK births. Screening and diagnostic haemoglobin thresholds were broadly consistent with BSH guidance, whereas substantial variation was concentrated in treatment and monitoring: oral iron indications, dosing and duration; haemoglobin thresholds and clinical criteria for intravenous iron; and the timing, biomarkers and response definitions used after treatment. Ferritin thresholds, reassessment intervals and response criteria were frequently absent or divergent. Variation was greatest in domains where the underlying evidence base is least resolved. These findings characterise the nature and extent of guideline-level variation across NHS maternity care and identify priority areas for future research and national guideline development.

British Journal of Haematology
University of Wolverhampton (GB), Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB), NHS Blood and Transplant (GB), New Cross Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Trinity House (GB), Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust (GB), Keele University (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.