Relative colon wall attenuation – distinguishing ischemia from other colon wall changes

BACKGROUND: Differentiation of bowel wall changes between ischemia and other causes in CT imaging can prove challenging, particularly in colon wall. Therefore, measurement of relative colon wall attenuation and contrast uptake were evaluated for aiding in diagnosis of colon ischemia. METHODS: CTs with inquiry for bowel ischemia were retrospectively identified. Cases involving colon ischemia or colon wall changes of other etiologies were included. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in representative areas of colon wall with and without evident changes, in arterial and venous phase images, respectively. Means of the ROIs were used to calculate the relative bowel enhancement between affected and unaffected wall in each contrast phase, as well as the contrast uptake of the wall between phases. Relative enhancement and contrast uptake were compared between patients with and without ischemia. A subset of cases was reanalyzed for intra- and inter-reader comparison. RESULTS: 31 patients with and 56 patients without ischemia were included. Relative enhancement of affected to unaffected colon wall was -51.2% in arterial phase and -44.6% in venous phase images for patients with ischemia. Relative enhancement was significantly higher in patients without ischemia at -0.5% in both phases (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in contrast uptake of affected bowel (40.6% vs. 39.8% respectively, p = 0.67). ROC curves revealed a maximum Youden-Index at a cut-off of -37.4% (AUC: 0.818) in arterial phase to differentiate between groups. Intra-reader comparison showed a good, and inter-reader a moderate, correlation in a subset. CONCLUSIONS: Objective measurement of relative colon wall attenuation between affected and unaffected areas can be an additional imaging feature to aid in identifying ischemic colon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02713-5
Primary Topic
Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative colon wall attenuation – distinguishing ischemia from other colon wall changes

Sophia Lüken, Jonas Oppenheimer, Thomas Elgeti, Lars-Arne Schaafs et al.
BMC Medical Imaging
Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
article

Relative colon wall attenuation – distinguishing ischemia from other colon wall changes

Sophia Lüken, Jonas Oppenheimer, Thomas Elgeti, Lars-Arne Schaafs, Elena Sonnenberg, Ingo Steffen, Christian Schineis, Hans Tepe
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differentiation of bowel wall changes between ischemia and other causes in CT imaging can prove challenging, particularly in colon wall. Therefore, measurement of relative colon wall attenuation and contrast uptake were evaluated for aiding in diagnosis of colon ischemia. METHODS: CTs with inquiry for bowel ischemia were retrospectively identified. Cases involving colon ischemia or colon wall changes of other etiologies were included. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in representative areas of colon wall with and without evident changes, in arterial and venous phase images, respectively. Means of the ROIs were used to calculate the relative bowel enhancement between affected and unaffected wall in each contrast phase, as well as the contrast uptake of the wall between phases. Relative enhancement and contrast uptake were compared between patients with and without ischemia. A subset of cases was reanalyzed for intra- and inter-reader comparison. RESULTS: 31 patients with and 56 patients without ischemia were included. Relative enhancement of affected to unaffected colon wall was -51.2% in arterial phase and -44.6% in venous phase images for patients with ischemia. Relative enhancement was significantly higher in patients without ischemia at -0.5% in both phases (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in contrast uptake of affected bowel (40.6% vs. 39.8% respectively, p = 0.67). ROC curves revealed a maximum Youden-Index at a cut-off of -37.4% (AUC: 0.818) in arterial phase to differentiate between groups. Intra-reader comparison showed a good, and inter-reader a moderate, correlation in a subset. CONCLUSIONS: Objective measurement of relative colon wall attenuation between affected and unaffected areas can be an additional imaging feature to aid in identifying ischemic colon.

BMC Medical ImagingVol. 26(1)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.