Exploring a potential model for pharmacist credentialling in Canada

Abstract Background: In Canada, various professional training pathways exist for pharmacists, but there is a lack of clarity regarding how to best demonstrate an advanced or specialized pharmacy practice outside of these established designations. Credentialling offers formal acknowledgement of pharmacists’ advanced knowledge, skills, or competencies, but no Canadian credentialling program currently exists. Objective: To describe perspectives on possible Canadian credentialling models for advanced and/or specialized pharmacy practice. Methods: This cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted from May 7 to July 12, 2024 using Qualtrics. Licensed pharmacists in Canada with roles that include ≥50% direct patient care or pharmacy leaders in Canada with formal management roles overseeing pharmacists were included. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Results: A total of 232 pharmacists and 54 pharmacy leaders consented to participate in the survey, with 98 (42%) pharmacists and 27 (50%) pharmacy leaders completing it in full. Fifty-five percent of pharmacists and 48% of pharmacy leaders agreed that advanced pharmacy practice credentialling should be established in Canada. Specialized pharmacy practice credentialling was supported by 72% of pharmacists and 71% of pharmacy leaders. A combined format of written examination and portfolio-based credentialling was preferred by 49% of pharmacists and 67% of pharmacy leaders. The top 3 barriers to pharmacists obtaining and maintaining credentials were workload, costs, and the lack of employer recognition. Conclusion: There is interest in developing a Canadian pharmacy credentialling model, with preference for a combined written examination and portfolio-based assessment. This approach, particularly for specialized areas of pharmacy practice, warrants further exploration. However, addressing key barriers will be crucial for successful adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/cpj-25-0126
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring a potential model for pharmacist credentialling in Canada

Michael Legal, Kyle John Wilby, Cindy Luo, Kelly Grindrod et al.
Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Exploring a potential model for pharmacist credentialling in Canada

Michael Legal, Kyle John Wilby, Cindy Luo, Kelly Grindrod, Karen Dahri, Katelyn Halpape, Rochelle Gellatly, Jacqueline Kwok, Jennifer Shiu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: In Canada, various professional training pathways exist for pharmacists, but there is a lack of clarity regarding how to best demonstrate an advanced or specialized pharmacy practice outside of these established designations. Credentialling offers formal acknowledgement of pharmacists’ advanced knowledge, skills, or competencies, but no Canadian credentialling program currently exists. Objective: To describe perspectives on possible Canadian credentialling models for advanced and/or specialized pharmacy practice. Methods: This cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted from May 7 to July 12, 2024 using Qualtrics. Licensed pharmacists in Canada with roles that include ≥50% direct patient care or pharmacy leaders in Canada with formal management roles overseeing pharmacists were included. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Results: A total of 232 pharmacists and 54 pharmacy leaders consented to participate in the survey, with 98 (42%) pharmacists and 27 (50%) pharmacy leaders completing it in full. Fifty-five percent of pharmacists and 48% of pharmacy leaders agreed that advanced pharmacy practice credentialling should be established in Canada. Specialized pharmacy practice credentialling was supported by 72% of pharmacists and 71% of pharmacy leaders. A combined format of written examination and portfolio-based credentialling was preferred by 49% of pharmacists and 67% of pharmacy leaders. The top 3 barriers to pharmacists obtaining and maintaining credentials were workload, costs, and the lack of employer recognition. Conclusion: There is interest in developing a Canadian pharmacy credentialling model, with preference for a combined written examination and portfolio-based assessment. This approach, particularly for specialized areas of pharmacy practice, warrants further exploration. However, addressing key barriers will be crucial for successful adoption.

Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada
Dalhousie University (CA), Langley Research Center (US), Royal Columbian Hospital (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Alberta (CA), West Pharmaceutical Services (United Kingdom) (GB), Alberta Hospital Edmonton (CA), Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital and Clinics (US), Vancouver General Hospital (CA), University of Alberta Hospital (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), Langley Green Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.