4.4 – EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE. THE MISTAKE OF SCIENCE – NATURE IS NOT PROBABILISTIC. THE RETURN OF NANOPARTICLES TO EXACT SCIENCES.

Abstract: This is the fourth article of one group of four about the first presentation of The Essential Theory of Everything, of the Universe - ETE-U. We will build a scenario to illustrate the differences between subjective/probabilistic and objective / mathematical/numerical propositions. We will highlight the errors found in science, especially in Quantum Physics. We present the reasons that lead to the impediment of nature being probabilistic. We make an analogy with the science of innovation, which has a failure rate of 97% of ideas due to the dependence on guesswork and probabilities. Quantum physics makes the same mistake by replacing traditional physics (mathematics) with a bias, a probabilistic shortcut that blocks its enrichment. Probabilistic environments are abundant in assumptions, guesses, divergences, inefficiencies, skating in the advance of knowledge, and fostering a frequent return to the beginning. But in mathematical/logical environments, logical/numerical convergence contributes with " effectiveness that generates greater efficiency," allowing continuous development, generation after generation, creating the "silver bullet" whose existence borders on the impossible in the environments of assumptions and opinions. At the end, we show that the Equation of the Universe is an excellent opportunity for nanoparticle physics to return from where it should never have left. In the same way, starting a trajectory based on the PEE of the exact sciences would be much more efficient for the science of innovation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22050343
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

4.4 – EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE. THE MISTAKE OF SCIENCE – NATURE IS NOT PROBABILISTIC. THE RETURN OF NANOPARTICLES TO EXACT SCIENCES.

Rui Santo
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
article

4.4 – EQUATION OF THE UNIVERSE. THE MISTAKE OF SCIENCE – NATURE IS NOT PROBABILISTIC. THE RETURN OF NANOPARTICLES TO EXACT SCIENCES.

Rui Santo
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This is the fourth article of one group of four about the first presentation of The Essential Theory of Everything, of the Universe - ETE-U. We will build a scenario to illustrate the differences between subjective/probabilistic and objective / mathematical/numerical propositions. We will highlight the errors found in science, especially in Quantum Physics. We present the reasons that lead to the impediment of nature being probabilistic. We make an analogy with the science of innovation, which has a failure rate of 97% of ideas due to the dependence on guesswork and probabilities. Quantum physics makes the same mistake by replacing traditional physics (mathematics) with a bias, a probabilistic shortcut that blocks its enrichment. Probabilistic environments are abundant in assumptions, guesses, divergences, inefficiencies, skating in the advance of knowledge, and fostering a frequent return to the beginning. But in mathematical/logical environments, logical/numerical convergence contributes with " effectiveness that generates greater efficiency," allowing continuous development, generation after generation, creating the "silver bullet" whose existence borders on the impossible in the environments of assumptions and opinions. At the end, we show that the Equation of the Universe is an excellent opportunity for nanoparticle physics to return from where it should never have left. In the same way, starting a trajectory based on the PEE of the exact sciences would be much more efficient for the science of innovation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.