Favorable Adherence and Tolerability of Letermovir Versus Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients Aged 65 y or Older: Findings From a Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

Background. Older patients undergoing kidney transplantation are at risk of perioperative complications, underscoring the need for optimized care. The number of kidney transplants in older adults has increased in the past decade, with greater reliance on transplants from deceased donors. Methods. The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled P002 study evaluated 200 d of letermovir versus valganciclovir prophylaxis in cytomegalovirus-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who received kidneys from cytomegalovirus-seropositive donors. Outcomes among participants aged 65 y or older are reported. Results. Forty-eight and 55 participants aged 65 y or older received letermovir or valganciclovir, respectively. A lower percentage of participants receiving letermovir versus valganciclovir had committee-confirmed cytomegalovirus disease through week 52 posttransplant (9% versus 22%; stratum-adjusted difference, –12% [95% confidence interval [CI], –27% to 2%]), without significant differences in cytomegalovirus disease or viremia between groups. A significantly higher percentage of participants receiving letermovir had ≥90% prophylaxis adherence (96% [95% CI, 86%-100%] versus 49% [95% CI, 35%-63%]). The letermovir group showed numerically lower incidences of drug-related adverse events (25% versus 49%) and study medication discontinuations due to adverse events (10% versus 20%). A significantly lower percentage of participants receiving letermovir had leukopenia or neutropenia events through week 28 posttransplant (31% [95% CI, 19%-46%] versus 62% [95% CI, 48%-75%]). Participants receiving letermovir had numerically lower rates of opportunistic infections (11% versus 25%) and rehospitalizations (51% versus 69%) through week 52 posttransplant. Conclusions. Letermovir showed substantial advantages over valganciclovir in adherence, safety, and tolerability, supporting its use as an important option for cytomegalovirus disease prophylaxis for older patients undergoing kidney transplantation. Clinical trial registration number. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03443869

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation Direct
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/txd.0000000000001990
Primary Topic
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Favorable Adherence and Tolerability of Letermovir Versus Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients Aged 65 y or Older: Findings From a Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

Suphamai Bunnapradist, F. Vincenti, Stefan Schneeberger, Christopher L. Gilbert et al.
Transplantation Direct
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
article

Favorable Adherence and Tolerability of Letermovir Versus Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients Aged 65 y or Older: Findings From a Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

Suphamai Bunnapradist, F. Vincenti, Stefan Schneeberger, Christopher L. Gilbert, Natalya Broyde, Oliver Witzke, M. Hong Nguyen, Barbara Haber
article en

Abstract

Background. Older patients undergoing kidney transplantation are at risk of perioperative complications, underscoring the need for optimized care. The number of kidney transplants in older adults has increased in the past decade, with greater reliance on transplants from deceased donors. Methods. The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled P002 study evaluated 200 d of letermovir versus valganciclovir prophylaxis in cytomegalovirus-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who received kidneys from cytomegalovirus-seropositive donors. Outcomes among participants aged 65 y or older are reported. Results. Forty-eight and 55 participants aged 65 y or older received letermovir or valganciclovir, respectively. A lower percentage of participants receiving letermovir versus valganciclovir had committee-confirmed cytomegalovirus disease through week 52 posttransplant (9% versus 22%; stratum-adjusted difference, –12% [95% confidence interval [CI], –27% to 2%]), without significant differences in cytomegalovirus disease or viremia between groups. A significantly higher percentage of participants receiving letermovir had ≥90% prophylaxis adherence (96% [95% CI, 86%-100%] versus 49% [95% CI, 35%-63%]). The letermovir group showed numerically lower incidences of drug-related adverse events (25% versus 49%) and study medication discontinuations due to adverse events (10% versus 20%). A significantly lower percentage of participants receiving letermovir had leukopenia or neutropenia events through week 28 posttransplant (31% [95% CI, 19%-46%] versus 62% [95% CI, 48%-75%]). Participants receiving letermovir had numerically lower rates of opportunistic infections (11% versus 25%) and rehospitalizations (51% versus 69%) through week 52 posttransplant. Conclusions. Letermovir showed substantial advantages over valganciclovir in adherence, safety, and tolerability, supporting its use as an important option for cytomegalovirus disease prophylaxis for older patients undergoing kidney transplantation. Clinical trial registration number. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03443869

Transplantation DirectVol. 12(9)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Innsbruck Medical University (AT), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), University of San Francisco (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.