Comparing Health System Costs for Recipients of Minimally Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) and Therapist-Guided CBT in Routine Care: A Cohort Study Using Ontario's Linked Health-Administrative Data: Comparaison des coûts pou

Objective Internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) is a scalable alternative to therapist-guided CBT, requiring fewer therapist resources. We compared health system costs in individuals receiving minimally guided iCBT (self-directed online modules with asynchronous therapist support) to those receiving therapist-guided CBT (scheduled, one-on-one sessions) in Ontario, Canada (January 2020–August 2021). Methods This retrospective cohort study leveraged linked health-administrative data to estimate person-centred health system costs, overall and mental health (MH)-related, one- and two-years post-treatment for all major healthcare services (emergency departments, hospitalizations, physician visits, long-term/home care, and outpatient prescription drugs). Generalized linear models were used to examine the effect of treatment modality on costs, adjusting for patient sociodemographic characteristics, clinical factors, and pre-treatment healthcare utilization. Results Among N = 167 individuals enrolled in iCBT and N = 300 receiving CBT, we found that iCBT recipients were more likely to use MH-related acute care and outpatient services (primary care physicians and psychiatrists) following treatment. The average MH-specific costs per person were $1,668 for iCBT (95% CI $0, $7,299) and $979 ($0, $4,821) for standard CBT 1-year post-treatment and $4,086 ($0, $17,049) and $2,023 ($0, $9,027), respectively, 2 years post-treatment. However, following regression adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, baseline symptoms, and pre-treatment MH-related service use, there were no statistically significant differences in one-year and two-year post-treatment total or MH-related costs between the groups ( P > .05). This finding remained robust among individuals meeting criteria for anxiety and depression treatment effectiveness. Conclusions iCBT may represent a scalable approach to expanding access to MH care without significantly increasing long-term health system costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437261477547
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Health System Costs for Recipients of Minimally Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) and Therapist-Guided CBT in Routine Care: A Cohort Study Using Ontario's Linked Health-Administrative Data: Comparaison des coûts pou

Evgenia Gatov, Paul Kurdyak, Claire de Oliveira, David Wiljer et al.
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Comparing Health System Costs for Recipients of Minimally Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) and Therapist-Guided CBT in Routine Care: A Cohort Study Using Ontario's Linked Health-Administrative Data: Comparaison des coûts pou

Evgenia Gatov, Paul Kurdyak, Claire de Oliveira, David Wiljer, Gillian Strudwick, Onil Bhattacharyya
article en

Abstract

Objective Internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) is a scalable alternative to therapist-guided CBT, requiring fewer therapist resources. We compared health system costs in individuals receiving minimally guided iCBT (self-directed online modules with asynchronous therapist support) to those receiving therapist-guided CBT (scheduled, one-on-one sessions) in Ontario, Canada (January 2020–August 2021). Methods This retrospective cohort study leveraged linked health-administrative data to estimate person-centred health system costs, overall and mental health (MH)-related, one- and two-years post-treatment for all major healthcare services (emergency departments, hospitalizations, physician visits, long-term/home care, and outpatient prescription drugs). Generalized linear models were used to examine the effect of treatment modality on costs, adjusting for patient sociodemographic characteristics, clinical factors, and pre-treatment healthcare utilization. Results Among N = 167 individuals enrolled in iCBT and N = 300 receiving CBT, we found that iCBT recipients were more likely to use MH-related acute care and outpatient services (primary care physicians and psychiatrists) following treatment. The average MH-specific costs per person were $1,668 for iCBT (95% CI $0, $7,299) and $979 ($0, $4,821) for standard CBT 1-year post-treatment and $4,086 ($0, $17,049) and $2,023 ($0, $9,027), respectively, 2 years post-treatment. However, following regression adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, baseline symptoms, and pre-treatment MH-related service use, there were no statistically significant differences in one-year and two-year post-treatment total or MH-related costs between the groups ( P > .05). This finding remained robust among individuals meeting criteria for anxiety and depression treatment effectiveness. Conclusions iCBT may represent a scalable approach to expanding access to MH care without significantly increasing long-term health system costs.

The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
University Health Network (CA), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), Health Net (US)
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.