Conflict as Contact: Acknowledgement-Seeking as a Candidate Function of Unsolicited Online Provocation

Digital environments have expanded opportunities for interpersonal communication while leaving loneliness and perceived social disconnection widespread. Within these environments, a substantial share of negative interaction is unsolicited: individuals initiate derogatory or provocative communication with strangers, creators, and public figures with whom they have no prior relationship. Existing accounts explain such behaviour primarily through personality dispositions, entertainment motives, ideological commitment, and status competition, and thereby identify who provokes rather than what maintains the behaviour. This theoretical article proposes an additional and empirically distinguishable functional account, the Conflict-as-Contact Hypothesis (CCH), which holds that some unsolicited online provocation is maintained because it reliably produces interpersonal acknowledgement, and that acknowledgement may reinforce independently of its emotional valence. The article advances a specific falsifiable claim: under conditions of perceived social invisibility, an aversive interpersonal response such as anger, defensiveness, or retaliation may function as an appetitive reinforcer rather than as a punisher. This mechanism is formalised as the Conflict-Attention-Reinforcement Loop and expressed as six testable propositions with specified disconfirming outcomes. The framework is explicitly differentiated from several adjacent accounts, including rejection-induced aggression, compensatory internet use, negative social potency, and visibility enhancement through antagonism. A discriminating test is identified in the neutral acknowledging response, which the dominance interpretation predicts to be non-reinforcing and which CCH predicts to be partially reinforcing. CCH does not claim that trolling is caused by loneliness, nor that online aggression is covertly prosocial; it proposes acknowledgement-seeking as one candidate function among several non-exclusive functions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22046562
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Conflict as Contact: Acknowledgement-Seeking as a Candidate Function of Unsolicited Online Provocation

Stoyana Natseva
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
preprint

Conflict as Contact: Acknowledgement-Seeking as a Candidate Function of Unsolicited Online Provocation

Stoyana Natseva
preprint en

Abstract

Digital environments have expanded opportunities for interpersonal communication while leaving loneliness and perceived social disconnection widespread. Within these environments, a substantial share of negative interaction is unsolicited: individuals initiate derogatory or provocative communication with strangers, creators, and public figures with whom they have no prior relationship. Existing accounts explain such behaviour primarily through personality dispositions, entertainment motives, ideological commitment, and status competition, and thereby identify who provokes rather than what maintains the behaviour. This theoretical article proposes an additional and empirically distinguishable functional account, the Conflict-as-Contact Hypothesis (CCH), which holds that some unsolicited online provocation is maintained because it reliably produces interpersonal acknowledgement, and that acknowledgement may reinforce independently of its emotional valence. The article advances a specific falsifiable claim: under conditions of perceived social invisibility, an aversive interpersonal response such as anger, defensiveness, or retaliation may function as an appetitive reinforcer rather than as a punisher. This mechanism is formalised as the Conflict-Attention-Reinforcement Loop and expressed as six testable propositions with specified disconfirming outcomes. The framework is explicitly differentiated from several adjacent accounts, including rejection-induced aggression, compensatory internet use, negative social potency, and visibility enhancement through antagonism. A discriminating test is identified in the neutral acknowledging response, which the dominance interpretation predicts to be non-reinforcing and which CCH predicts to be partially reinforcing. CCH does not claim that trolling is caused by loneliness, nor that online aggression is covertly prosocial; it proposes acknowledgement-seeking as one candidate function among several non-exclusive functions.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Life Science Institute (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.