Cannabinoid neuroprotection and cardiotoxicity in retinal disease: the role of the THC:CBD ratio

Cannabinoids, compounds acting on the endocannabinoid system (ECS) and the broader endocannabinoidome, have demonstrated promising neuroprotective effects in retinal neurodegenerative diseases including glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This review evaluates the evidence for cannabinoid receptor expression and function in the retina, the capacity of cannabinoids to reduce oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, and outcomes in preclinical disease models. Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) act through cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2) receptors, as well as non-canonical pathways including transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1), G-protein coupled receptor 3 (GPR3), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), to confer neuroprotective benefits. However, emerging evidence documents a critical divergence between these two principal phytocannabinoids: while CBD exerts anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and cardioprotective effects, THC at high concentrations, and especially when uncounteracted by similar levels of CBD, induces neurotoxicity, cardiovascular injury, and arrhythmia, exemplified by a doubling of cardiovascular mortality, largely due to THC-mediated mechanisms. Critically, previously identified neuroprotective effects of cannabis may be substantially masked or reversed by the dramatically rising THC:CBD ratio in commercial strains, which has increased from approximately 10:1 in 2000 to 100:1 in many contemporary products. This shift means that modern cannabis is biochemically distinct from the preparations used in foundational neuroprotection studies. CBD-dominant formulations, or preparations maintaining lower THC:CBD ratios, represent a valid therapeutic direction for acute retinal neuroprotection, while the proven safety and efficacy of vitamins such as Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) therapy provide a reliable chronic neuroprotective strategy. While the biological plausibility and animal evidence for CBD/THC protection is good, human trials are needed to validate any use in retinal diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Neuroscience and Brain Research
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/acadneurosci8479
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cannabinoid neuroprotection and cardiotoxicity in retinal disease: the role of the THC:CBD ratio

George Ayoub
Academia Neuroscience and Brain Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Cannabinoid neuroprotection and cardiotoxicity in retinal disease: the role of the THC:CBD ratio

George Ayoub
article en

Abstract

Cannabinoids, compounds acting on the endocannabinoid system (ECS) and the broader endocannabinoidome, have demonstrated promising neuroprotective effects in retinal neurodegenerative diseases including glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This review evaluates the evidence for cannabinoid receptor expression and function in the retina, the capacity of cannabinoids to reduce oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, and outcomes in preclinical disease models. Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) act through cannabinoid receptors 1 and 2 (CB1 and CB2) receptors, as well as non-canonical pathways including transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1), G-protein coupled receptor 3 (GPR3), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), to confer neuroprotective benefits. However, emerging evidence documents a critical divergence between these two principal phytocannabinoids: while CBD exerts anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and cardioprotective effects, THC at high concentrations, and especially when uncounteracted by similar levels of CBD, induces neurotoxicity, cardiovascular injury, and arrhythmia, exemplified by a doubling of cardiovascular mortality, largely due to THC-mediated mechanisms. Critically, previously identified neuroprotective effects of cannabis may be substantially masked or reversed by the dramatically rising THC:CBD ratio in commercial strains, which has increased from approximately 10:1 in 2000 to 100:1 in many contemporary products. This shift means that modern cannabis is biochemically distinct from the preparations used in foundational neuroprotection studies. CBD-dominant formulations, or preparations maintaining lower THC:CBD ratios, represent a valid therapeutic direction for acute retinal neuroprotection, while the proven safety and efficacy of vitamins such as Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) therapy provide a reliable chronic neuroprotective strategy. While the biological plausibility and animal evidence for CBD/THC protection is good, human trials are needed to validate any use in retinal diseases.

Academia Neuroscience and Brain ResearchVol. 2(3)
Santa Barbara City College (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.