Clinical Outcomes of the Allegra Transcatheter System in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Failure: A Multicentre Valve‐in‐Valve Registry

ABSTRACT Introduction The prevalence of bioprosthetic aortic valve failure is increasing due to the broader use of bioprosthetic valves, both surgical and transcatheter, and an ageing population. Registry data indicate a higher risk of coronary obstruction and elevated gradients following valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We report outcomes of the Allegra transcatheter heart valve system in valve‐in‐valve TAVI. Methods In this retrospective multicentre cohort study, all patients undergoing valve‐in‐valve TAVI with the Allegra system between 2019 and 2025 at five UK centers were included. The combined primary outcomes were technical success, device success, and early safety at 30 days, as per the VARC‐3 (Valve Academic Research Consortium‐3) criteria. A key secondary outcome was all‐cause mortality at the longest documented follow‐up. Results A total of 106 patients underwent valve‐in‐valve TAVI. The mean age was 79 ± 6 years, with 57.5% being female. Almost half of the patients had an index valve ≤ 21 mm, with an STS (Society of Thoracic Surgery) score of 7.1% (5.1–12.0). The post‐implant aortic valve mean pressure gradient was 12 ± 6 mmHg, and the mean valve area was 1.7 ± 0.5 cm 2 . The combined primary outcomes were technical success of 86.8% (CI 80.3%–93.2%), device success of 75.5% (CI 67.3%–83.7%), and early safety of 86.8% (CI 80.3%–93.2%). All‐cause mortality at 30 days was 0%. All‐cause mortality occurred in 6.6% at a median follow‐up of 15 months. Conclusions The Allegra TAVI system demonstrates promising technical and device success rates, with early safety and good post‐implant haemodynamic performance in high‐risk patients undergoing valve‐in‐valve TAVI. Larger randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70811
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes of the Allegra Transcatheter System in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Failure: A Multicentre Valve‐in‐Valve Registry

Abdalazeem Ibrahem, Hilal Khan, Ayush Khurana, Freidoon Keshavarzi et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Clinical Outcomes of the Allegra Transcatheter System in Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Failure: A Multicentre Valve‐in‐Valve Registry

Abdalazeem Ibrahem, Hilal Khan, Ayush Khurana, Freidoon Keshavarzi, Dr.Mohamed Ali, Karim Ratib, Hesham K. Abdelaziz, Nur Ilia Mohd Zaki, Diana A. Gorog, Azfar Zaman, Mohamed Farag, Alok D. Shah, Rajiv Das, Alexander Chase, Mohammad AlKhalil
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction The prevalence of bioprosthetic aortic valve failure is increasing due to the broader use of bioprosthetic valves, both surgical and transcatheter, and an ageing population. Registry data indicate a higher risk of coronary obstruction and elevated gradients following valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We report outcomes of the Allegra transcatheter heart valve system in valve‐in‐valve TAVI. Methods In this retrospective multicentre cohort study, all patients undergoing valve‐in‐valve TAVI with the Allegra system between 2019 and 2025 at five UK centers were included. The combined primary outcomes were technical success, device success, and early safety at 30 days, as per the VARC‐3 (Valve Academic Research Consortium‐3) criteria. A key secondary outcome was all‐cause mortality at the longest documented follow‐up. Results A total of 106 patients underwent valve‐in‐valve TAVI. The mean age was 79 ± 6 years, with 57.5% being female. Almost half of the patients had an index valve ≤ 21 mm, with an STS (Society of Thoracic Surgery) score of 7.1% (5.1–12.0). The post‐implant aortic valve mean pressure gradient was 12 ± 6 mmHg, and the mean valve area was 1.7 ± 0.5 cm 2 . The combined primary outcomes were technical success of 86.8% (CI 80.3%–93.2%), device success of 75.5% (CI 67.3%–83.7%), and early safety of 86.8% (CI 80.3%–93.2%). All‐cause mortality at 30 days was 0%. All‐cause mortality occurred in 6.6% at a median follow‐up of 15 months. Conclusions The Allegra TAVI system demonstrates promising technical and device success rates, with early safety and good post‐implant haemodynamic performance in high‐risk patients undergoing valve‐in‐valve TAVI. Larger randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Swansea Bay University Health Board (GB), University of Hertfordshire (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Blackpool Victoria Hospital (GB), Freeman Hospital (GB), Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB), East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Keele University (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.