Decision configurations driving industry 4.0 technology prioritisation: evidence from Australian plastics manufacturing SMEs

Plastics manufacturing is often scrutinised for its environmental impact, but has significant potential to benefit from Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies. However, generic I4.0 adoption models overlook industry and technology-specific factors, causing resource-constrained plastics SMEs uncertain about how to prioritise technology investments. This study thus examines technology prioritisation decisions using data collected from 28 Australian plastics manufacturing SMEs between November 2024 and May 2025. A sequential mixed-methods approach was employed, combining Relative Importance Index (RII) analysis with fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). The RII analysis identified 18 decision criteria and eight priority I4.0 technologies. The fsQCA results revealed that a common configuration comprising technological infrastructure, technological integration, reliability, compatibility, relative advantage, and data security underpins the prioritisation of most technologies. However, simulation exhibited a distinct pathway in which reliability, ease of use, and compatibility compensated for the absence of broader technological readiness, suggesting a more modular and user-centric route to digitalisation. Environmental factors played a limited role, with competitive pressure and collaboration emerging as decisive only for machine-to-machine communication prioritisation. The findings demonstrate that technology prioritisation is driven by multiple equifinal pathways rather than universal antecedents and that the importance of decision criteria varies across technologies. Theoretically, the study develops a bounded configurational perspective of pre-adoption technology prioritisation by integrating the Technology–Organisation–Environment framework with insights from the Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and Technology Acceptance Model within a TOE-Cost(C) framework. Practically, the findings provide SMEs and industry stakeholders with actionable guidance for prioritising I4.0 investments for strengthening digital capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Business & Management
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2715156
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision configurations driving industry 4.0 technology prioritisation: evidence from Australian plastics manufacturing SMEs

Chunhui Yang, Dilupa Nakandala, Niranga Silva
Cogent Business & Management
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Decision configurations driving industry 4.0 technology prioritisation: evidence from Australian plastics manufacturing SMEs

Chunhui Yang, Dilupa Nakandala, Niranga Silva
article en

Abstract

Plastics manufacturing is often scrutinised for its environmental impact, but has significant potential to benefit from Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies. However, generic I4.0 adoption models overlook industry and technology-specific factors, causing resource-constrained plastics SMEs uncertain about how to prioritise technology investments. This study thus examines technology prioritisation decisions using data collected from 28 Australian plastics manufacturing SMEs between November 2024 and May 2025. A sequential mixed-methods approach was employed, combining Relative Importance Index (RII) analysis with fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). The RII analysis identified 18 decision criteria and eight priority I4.0 technologies. The fsQCA results revealed that a common configuration comprising technological infrastructure, technological integration, reliability, compatibility, relative advantage, and data security underpins the prioritisation of most technologies. However, simulation exhibited a distinct pathway in which reliability, ease of use, and compatibility compensated for the absence of broader technological readiness, suggesting a more modular and user-centric route to digitalisation. Environmental factors played a limited role, with competitive pressure and collaboration emerging as decisive only for machine-to-machine communication prioritisation. The findings demonstrate that technology prioritisation is driven by multiple equifinal pathways rather than universal antecedents and that the importance of decision criteria varies across technologies. Theoretically, the study develops a bounded configurational perspective of pre-adoption technology prioritisation by integrating the Technology–Organisation–Environment framework with insights from the Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and Technology Acceptance Model within a TOE-Cost(C) framework. Practically, the findings provide SMEs and industry stakeholders with actionable guidance for prioritising I4.0 investments for strengthening digital capabilities.

Cogent Business & ManagementVol. 13(1)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.