AI-Mediated Continuous Assessment Infrastructure (AIM-CAI): Connecting Learning Evidence Across Contexts and Time

Educational assessment systems have primarily relied on episodic forms of assessment, including examinations, assignments, grades, and credentials. These approaches provide efficient and scalable summaries of achievement and yet capture only part of the developmental process through which learners build competence. Moreover, learning increasingly unfolds across digital platforms, workplaces, collaborative networks, and AI-mediated environments, generating rich evidence of learner development that remains fragmented across systems and contexts. Advances in artificial intelligence, learning analytics, multimodal analytics, learner modeling, and semantic interoperability make it increasingly feasible to connect, integrate, and interpret this evidence across contexts and over time. This paper introduces the AI-Mediated Continuous Assessment Infrastructure (AIM-CAI), a sociotechnical framework supporting longitudinal, probabilistic interpretation of distributed evidence of learning. Within AIM-CAI, continuous assessment refers to the ongoing accumulation and dynamic interpretation of evidence generated through learning activities. The framework integrates distributed evidence systems, evidence serialization mechanisms, AI-mediated semantic translation, probabilistic learner models, dynamic competency profiles, and federated governance architectures to support context-sensitive interpretations of learner development while maintaining human judgment, privacy, accountability, and learner agency. The authors examine implications for assessment, credentialing, lifelong learning, institutional roles, interoperability, and governance and outline a research agenda addressing key psychometric, ethical, and governance challenges, including validity, fairness, surveillance, semantic instability, and ownership of learning evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17080806
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Mediated Continuous Assessment Infrastructure (AIM-CAI): Connecting Learning Evidence Across Contexts and Time

Mohammad Nehal Hasnine, Danielle S. McNamara
Information
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

AI-Mediated Continuous Assessment Infrastructure (AIM-CAI): Connecting Learning Evidence Across Contexts and Time

Mohammad Nehal Hasnine, Danielle S. McNamara
article en

Abstract

Educational assessment systems have primarily relied on episodic forms of assessment, including examinations, assignments, grades, and credentials. These approaches provide efficient and scalable summaries of achievement and yet capture only part of the developmental process through which learners build competence. Moreover, learning increasingly unfolds across digital platforms, workplaces, collaborative networks, and AI-mediated environments, generating rich evidence of learner development that remains fragmented across systems and contexts. Advances in artificial intelligence, learning analytics, multimodal analytics, learner modeling, and semantic interoperability make it increasingly feasible to connect, integrate, and interpret this evidence across contexts and over time. This paper introduces the AI-Mediated Continuous Assessment Infrastructure (AIM-CAI), a sociotechnical framework supporting longitudinal, probabilistic interpretation of distributed evidence of learning. Within AIM-CAI, continuous assessment refers to the ongoing accumulation and dynamic interpretation of evidence generated through learning activities. The framework integrates distributed evidence systems, evidence serialization mechanisms, AI-mediated semantic translation, probabilistic learner models, dynamic competency profiles, and federated governance architectures to support context-sensitive interpretations of learner development while maintaining human judgment, privacy, accountability, and learner agency. The authors examine implications for assessment, credentialing, lifelong learning, institutional roles, interoperability, and governance and outline a research agenda addressing key psychometric, ethical, and governance challenges, including validity, fairness, surveillance, semantic instability, and ownership of learning evidence.

InformationVol. 17(8)
Arizona State University (US)
Institute of Education Sciences
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI-Mediated Continuous Assessment Infrastructure (AIM-CAI): Connecting Learning Evidence Across Contexts and Time — Mohammad Nehal Hasnine, Danielle S. McNamara · Information (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS