Capitalism and intersecting modes of domination

By expanding Marx's original formulation, Cowan reconceptualizes subsumption as a historically and geographically contingent process through which capital organizes diverse social relations and offers a compelling account of the uneven, differentiated, and spatially variegated development of capitalism. Building on these insights, this commentary explores the broader theoretical implications of subsumption for examining the relationship between capitalism and other enduring structures of power. I argue that a comprehensive critique of domination requires understanding capitalism and other systems of domination, such as patriarchy and state power, not as a singular, unified matrix of oppression but as distinct social systems possessing irreducible ontologies that nevertheless become structurally articulated in concrete social formations. Such a critique demands a relational framework capable of analyzing how multiple forms of domination intersect and reshape one another while preserving their analytical specificity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues in Human Geography
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206261479830
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capitalism and intersecting modes of domination

Siyuan Yin
Dialogues in Human Geography
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Capitalism and intersecting modes of domination

Siyuan Yin
article en

Abstract

By expanding Marx's original formulation, Cowan reconceptualizes subsumption as a historically and geographically contingent process through which capital organizes diverse social relations and offers a compelling account of the uneven, differentiated, and spatially variegated development of capitalism. Building on these insights, this commentary explores the broader theoretical implications of subsumption for examining the relationship between capitalism and other enduring structures of power. I argue that a comprehensive critique of domination requires understanding capitalism and other systems of domination, such as patriarchy and state power, not as a singular, unified matrix of oppression but as distinct social systems possessing irreducible ontologies that nevertheless become structurally articulated in concrete social formations. Such a critique demands a relational framework capable of analyzing how multiple forms of domination intersect and reshape one another while preserving their analytical specificity.

Dialogues in Human Geography
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Capitalism and intersecting modes of domination — Siyuan Yin · Dialogues in Human Geography (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS