Latent Profiles of Illness and Treatment Perceptions and Their Associations with Adherence and Asthma Control

Background: Asthma control remains suboptimal in a large proportion of patients, partly due to poor treatment adherence. Illness and treatment perceptions have been identified as key determinants of adherence and disease outcomes; however, their combined influence has been less frequently examined using person-centered approaches. Objective: To identify latent profiles of illness perceptions, treatment beliefs, and adherence behaviors in Mexican adults with asthma, and to examine differences in asthma control across these profiles. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 264 adults with asthma. Latent profile analysis was performed using indicators of illness perceptions, treatment beliefs, and adherence behaviors. Models were compared using AIC, BIC, entropy, BLRT, and class size. Between-profile differences in asthma control and clinical variables were examined using nonparametric tests in R. Results: A three-profile solution was selected. Profile 1 showed intermediate levels across most indicators. Profile 2 was characterized by higher emotional representations, perceived consequences, and treatment concerns, as well as lower illness coherence and lower adherence, and was associated with poorer asthma control. Profile 3 showed lower emotional burden, higher illness understanding, greater personal control, higher adherence, and better asthma control. Significant differences were observed across profiles in asthma control, rescue inhaler use, and emergency department visits, although effect sizes for clinical outcomes were small. Conclusions: Distinct profiles were associated with differences in asthma control. Emotional representations and treatment concerns appear to play a central role in identifying patients at higher risk of poor adherence and suboptimal asthma control. These findings support the relevance of incorporating psychological assessment into asthma management and tailoring interventions according to patient profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asthma
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2026.2721163
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Latent Profiles of Illness and Treatment Perceptions and Their Associations with Adherence and Asthma Control

Centli Guillén-Díaz-Barriga, Margarita Fernández-Vega, Leonardo Reynoso Erazo, Isaías Vicente Lugo-González et al.
Journal of Asthma
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Latent Profiles of Illness and Treatment Perceptions and Their Associations with Adherence and Asthma Control

Centli Guillén-Díaz-Barriga, Margarita Fernández-Vega, Leonardo Reynoso Erazo, Isaías Vicente Lugo-González, Yuma Yoaly Pérez Bautista
article en

Abstract

Background: Asthma control remains suboptimal in a large proportion of patients, partly due to poor treatment adherence. Illness and treatment perceptions have been identified as key determinants of adherence and disease outcomes; however, their combined influence has been less frequently examined using person-centered approaches. Objective: To identify latent profiles of illness perceptions, treatment beliefs, and adherence behaviors in Mexican adults with asthma, and to examine differences in asthma control across these profiles. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 264 adults with asthma. Latent profile analysis was performed using indicators of illness perceptions, treatment beliefs, and adherence behaviors. Models were compared using AIC, BIC, entropy, BLRT, and class size. Between-profile differences in asthma control and clinical variables were examined using nonparametric tests in R. Results: A three-profile solution was selected. Profile 1 showed intermediate levels across most indicators. Profile 2 was characterized by higher emotional representations, perceived consequences, and treatment concerns, as well as lower illness coherence and lower adherence, and was associated with poorer asthma control. Profile 3 showed lower emotional burden, higher illness understanding, greater personal control, higher adherence, and better asthma control. Significant differences were observed across profiles in asthma control, rescue inhaler use, and emergency department visits, although effect sizes for clinical outcomes were small. Conclusions: Distinct profiles were associated with differences in asthma control. Emotional representations and treatment concerns appear to play a central role in identifying patients at higher risk of poor adherence and suboptimal asthma control. These findings support the relevance of incorporating psychological assessment into asthma management and tailoring interventions according to patient profiles.

Journal of Asthma
Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala (MX), Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México (MX), Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (MX)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.