Outcomes of Single-View Asymmetries Recalled From Screening Mammography and Exploratory Analysis of AI Detection

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic outcomes of single-view asymmetries (SVAs) recalled from screening mammography and to explore the association between artificial intelligence (AI) detection and malignancy. Methods: This REB-approved retrospective single-center study included women recalled for SVAs from screening mammography performed at The Ottawa Hospital between March 1, 2024 and March 31, 2025. SVAs were defined as asymmetries identified on a single mammographic projection. Screening performance metrics were obtained from the EPIC Mammography Quality Standards Act module, and imaging outcomes were reviewed in PACS. Primary outcomes included cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive value for recall (PPV1), and positive predictive value for biopsy (PPV3). Following implementation of AI software (Transpara) in September/October 2024, exploratory analyses evaluated associations between AI flag status and malignancy. Results: Among 32 412 screening examinations, 2455 patients (7.6%) were recalled, including 410 patients with 464 SVAs. Five cancers were identified, corresponding to a CDR of 0.16 per 1000 screened patients, significantly lower than the overall screening CDR of 6.08 per 1000 ( P < .0001). PPV1 for SVAs was 1.22% (5/410), significantly lower than the overall PPV1 of 8.02% (197/2455) ( P < .0001). Twenty-five patients (5.4%) underwent biopsy, yielding a PPV3 of 20%. Overall, 98.8% of recalled SVAs were non-malignant. Following AI implementation, malignancy rates were 0.6% (1/154) among non-flagged SVAs and 2.9% (2/68) among AI-flagged SVAs ( P = .17). All malignancies were Stage I at diagnosis. Conclusion: SVAs were a common but very low-yield cause of recall in screening mammography. Although exploratory, the low malignancy yield among non-AI-flagged SVAs suggests a potential role for AI as a supportive adjunct in risk stratification and recall decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371261475941
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of Single-View Asymmetries Recalled From Screening Mammography and Exploratory Analysis of AI Detection

Shrouq Solimanie, Fatma Eldehimi, Amit Katyan, Jean M. Seely et al.
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
AI in cancer detection
article

Outcomes of Single-View Asymmetries Recalled From Screening Mammography and Exploratory Analysis of AI Detection

Shrouq Solimanie, Fatma Eldehimi, Amit Katyan, Jean M. Seely, Huijuan Wang
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic outcomes of single-view asymmetries (SVAs) recalled from screening mammography and to explore the association between artificial intelligence (AI) detection and malignancy. Methods: This REB-approved retrospective single-center study included women recalled for SVAs from screening mammography performed at The Ottawa Hospital between March 1, 2024 and March 31, 2025. SVAs were defined as asymmetries identified on a single mammographic projection. Screening performance metrics were obtained from the EPIC Mammography Quality Standards Act module, and imaging outcomes were reviewed in PACS. Primary outcomes included cancer detection rate (CDR), positive predictive value for recall (PPV1), and positive predictive value for biopsy (PPV3). Following implementation of AI software (Transpara) in September/October 2024, exploratory analyses evaluated associations between AI flag status and malignancy. Results: Among 32 412 screening examinations, 2455 patients (7.6%) were recalled, including 410 patients with 464 SVAs. Five cancers were identified, corresponding to a CDR of 0.16 per 1000 screened patients, significantly lower than the overall screening CDR of 6.08 per 1000 ( P < .0001). PPV1 for SVAs was 1.22% (5/410), significantly lower than the overall PPV1 of 8.02% (197/2455) ( P < .0001). Twenty-five patients (5.4%) underwent biopsy, yielding a PPV3 of 20%. Overall, 98.8% of recalled SVAs were non-malignant. Following AI implementation, malignancy rates were 0.6% (1/154) among non-flagged SVAs and 2.9% (2/68) among AI-flagged SVAs ( P = .17). All malignancies were Stage I at diagnosis. Conclusion: SVAs were a common but very low-yield cause of recall in screening mammography. Although exploratory, the low malignancy yield among non-AI-flagged SVAs suggests a potential role for AI as a supportive adjunct in risk stratification and recall decision-making.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
University of Ottawa (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.