IUC26657-91 Sex-Based Disparities in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Data from Meet-URO33 Study

Abstract Background Sex-related biological differences may affect cancer immunity and outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This sub-analysis aimed to explore sex-based differences in a real-world cohort of patients with mRCC treated with first-line systemic therapy within the Meet-URO 33 (REGAL) study. Methods The Meet-URO 33 study is a multicentre ambispective registry collecting real-world data on patients with mRCC. Clinical-pathological features, haematological parameters, toxicities, and outcomes were compared by sex and age (< 50 vs ≥ 50 years). Results Among 1560 patients, 401 were females, and 1159 were males. Females presented with lower BMI (≤ 25 kg/m2, 52% vs 43%, p = 0.008) and lower median NLR (2.8 vs 3.1, p = 0.005), and had worse baseline characteristics, such as liver metastases (18% vs 11%, p = 0.002) and sarcomatoid variant (20.3% vs 14.5%, p = 0.025). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in females (35% vs 28%, p = 0.012), but no sex-related differences emerged in the pattern of AEs and discontinuation rates. No significant differences were observed in PFS (14.8 vs 17.6 months) and OS (39.3 vs 39.7 months). Females < 50 years experienced a shorter PFS (8.5 vs 19.6 months, HR 2.02, p = 0.009), Fig 1. In multivariable Cox complete-case analyses, sex was not independently associated with either PFS (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.97–1.51, p = 0.099) or OS (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.87–1.55, p = 0.307), and sensitivity analysis based on multiple imputation produced consistent results. Conclusions Female patients with mRCC presented with more adverse baseline features and experienced higher severe toxicity rates, although PFS and OS were comparable to male patients. However, multivariable analyses demonstrate that sex does not have an independent prognostic value. Subgroup analysis in female patients aged < 50 years showed worse PFS, suggesting a potential hormonal influence warranting further investigation. Stronger female representation and translational research are needed to guide sex-tailored strategies in advanced RCC. Acknowledgements The authors thank Meet-URO33 centres and investigators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag286.016
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IUC26657-91 Sex-Based Disparities in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Data from Meet-URO33 Study

A Signori, E Lai, S E Rebuzzi, M Di Napoli et al.
The Oncologist
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

IUC26657-91 Sex-Based Disparities in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Data from Meet-URO33 Study

A Signori, E Lai, S E Rebuzzi, M Di Napoli, E Verzoni, C Lolli, M Maffezzoli, S Buti, D Bimbatti, M Zinelli Ronzoni
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Sex-related biological differences may affect cancer immunity and outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). This sub-analysis aimed to explore sex-based differences in a real-world cohort of patients with mRCC treated with first-line systemic therapy within the Meet-URO 33 (REGAL) study. Methods The Meet-URO 33 study is a multicentre ambispective registry collecting real-world data on patients with mRCC. Clinical-pathological features, haematological parameters, toxicities, and outcomes were compared by sex and age (< 50 vs ≥ 50 years). Results Among 1560 patients, 401 were females, and 1159 were males. Females presented with lower BMI (≤ 25 kg/m2, 52% vs 43%, p = 0.008) and lower median NLR (2.8 vs 3.1, p = 0.005), and had worse baseline characteristics, such as liver metastases (18% vs 11%, p = 0.002) and sarcomatoid variant (20.3% vs 14.5%, p = 0.025). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in females (35% vs 28%, p = 0.012), but no sex-related differences emerged in the pattern of AEs and discontinuation rates. No significant differences were observed in PFS (14.8 vs 17.6 months) and OS (39.3 vs 39.7 months). Females < 50 years experienced a shorter PFS (8.5 vs 19.6 months, HR 2.02, p = 0.009), Fig 1. In multivariable Cox complete-case analyses, sex was not independently associated with either PFS (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.97–1.51, p = 0.099) or OS (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.87–1.55, p = 0.307), and sensitivity analysis based on multiple imputation produced consistent results. Conclusions Female patients with mRCC presented with more adverse baseline features and experienced higher severe toxicity rates, although PFS and OS were comparable to male patients. However, multivariable analyses demonstrate that sex does not have an independent prognostic value. Subgroup analysis in female patients aged < 50 years showed worse PFS, suggesting a potential hormonal influence warranting further investigation. Stronger female representation and translational research are needed to guide sex-tailored strategies in advanced RCC. Acknowledgements The authors thank Meet-URO33 centres and investigators.

The OncologistVol. 31(Supplement_2)
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), University Hospitals Parma Medical Center (US), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.