RI–HITL: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Auditable AI-Assisted Qualitative Text Analysis

This working paper introduces the Recursive–Iterative Human-in-the-Loop framework (RI–HITL), a structured and auditable workflow for AI-assisted qualitative text analysis. The framework is designed to improve procedural consistency, transparency, traceability, and bounded procedural reproducibility while retaining human interpretive authority at all analytically consequential stages. RI–HITL combines corpus delimitation, relevance identification, segmentation, calibration, explicit decision rules, recursive–iterative coding, logged revision, saturation stress-testing, analytical freezing, and post-freeze synthesis. AI is treated as a bounded support system rather than an autonomous analytical judge: permissible uses include retrieval, orientation, consistency checking, clustering, and metadata support, whereas final coding, unreviewed theory-bearing reinterpretation, and autonomous inference remain non-permissible. The paper includes a worked example, operational templates, an extended AI-governance checklist, and an appendix specifying how RI–HITL may be used downstream of AST-derived theorem structures during empirical operationalisation and instantiation testing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22047634
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RI–HITL: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Auditable AI-Assisted Qualitative Text Analysis

J. E. Fröderberg
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

RI–HITL: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Auditable AI-Assisted Qualitative Text Analysis

J. E. Fröderberg
article en

Abstract

This working paper introduces the Recursive–Iterative Human-in-the-Loop framework (RI–HITL), a structured and auditable workflow for AI-assisted qualitative text analysis. The framework is designed to improve procedural consistency, transparency, traceability, and bounded procedural reproducibility while retaining human interpretive authority at all analytically consequential stages. RI–HITL combines corpus delimitation, relevance identification, segmentation, calibration, explicit decision rules, recursive–iterative coding, logged revision, saturation stress-testing, analytical freezing, and post-freeze synthesis. AI is treated as a bounded support system rather than an autonomous analytical judge: permissible uses include retrieval, orientation, consistency checking, clustering, and metadata support, whereas final coding, unreviewed theory-bearing reinterpretation, and autonomous inference remain non-permissible. The paper includes a worked example, operational templates, an extended AI-governance checklist, and an appendix specifying how RI–HITL may be used downstream of AST-derived theorem structures during empirical operationalisation and instantiation testing.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.