IUC26692-90 Benchmarking Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Prediction Models for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Overall Survival in Bladder Cancer

Abstract Background Bladder cancer (BLCA) is a common urological malignancy with high recurrence and heterogeneous treatment response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed advanced BLCA treatment, yet response prediction remains challenging. AI-based models have been developed to predict ICI response and OS prognosis in BLCA. To benchmark AI models predicting ICI response and overall survival (OS) in BLCA, evaluating both predictive performance and reporting quality. Methods A search of OVID MEDLINE and EMBASE yielded 1412 raw records; 281 full-text articles were screened, of which 13 BLCA-specific studies met eligibility, 8 contributing quantifiable AUCs to the synthesis. AI-plus-clinical or combined-AI AUCs were excluded, retaining single-AI-model AUCs only. Studies were categorised into Category A (ICI response, RECIST-defined) and Category B (OS prognosis). As few studies reported confidence intervals, meta-analysis was not feasible; descriptive synthesis (medians, ranges) was performed instead. Results Category A comprised 7 AUCs from 4 studies (cohorts 11–384 patients); 6 of 7 were derived from IMvigor210, indicating overlap between studies, while the smallest-n estimate (n = 11) came from a separate cohort (GSE111636). The most robust model (Chen S et al. 2020, 10-gene ICIR-Score) achieved an internal validation AUC of 0.752 (95% CI 0.654–0.834, n = 98). External validation AUCs ranged 0.640–0.733 (median 0.669); whole-cohort AUCs ranged 0.719–0.805 (median 0.762). Category B comprised 24 OS AUC estimates from 4 studies. Training AUCs (cohorts 278–405 patients, all TCGA-BLCA-derived) increased across timepoints: 1-year median 0.667, 3-year median 0.695, 5-year median 0.730. External validation came from one study only (Zhang X et al. 2025, GSE32548 and GSE32894): 1-year median 0.670, 3-year median 0.710, 5-year median 0.726. Internal validation and whole-cohort estimates were likewise from one study only (Li Z et al. 2024, AUCs 0.751–0.763). Conclusions AI models show moderate-to-good discrimination for ICI response and OS prognosis in BLCA, but evidence is constrained by reliance on a single trial cohort (IMvigor210) and training cohort (TCGA-BLCA), with internal and external OS validation each corroborated by only one study, limiting generalisability. Larger, prospective, externally validated studies with consistent uncertainty reporting are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag286.008
Primary Topic
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IUC26692-90 Benchmarking Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Prediction Models for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Overall Survival in Bladder Cancer

A Maniam, V Ravindran, B Gonsalves, Y Agarwala et al.
The Oncologist
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
article

IUC26692-90 Benchmarking Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Prediction Models for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Overall Survival in Bladder Cancer

A Maniam, V Ravindran, B Gonsalves, Y Agarwala, A Tiwari, R Das, A Ghose, G Luigi Banna, R Dylan Frazer, S Adeleke, D Khanna
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Bladder cancer (BLCA) is a common urological malignancy with high recurrence and heterogeneous treatment response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed advanced BLCA treatment, yet response prediction remains challenging. AI-based models have been developed to predict ICI response and OS prognosis in BLCA. To benchmark AI models predicting ICI response and overall survival (OS) in BLCA, evaluating both predictive performance and reporting quality. Methods A search of OVID MEDLINE and EMBASE yielded 1412 raw records; 281 full-text articles were screened, of which 13 BLCA-specific studies met eligibility, 8 contributing quantifiable AUCs to the synthesis. AI-plus-clinical or combined-AI AUCs were excluded, retaining single-AI-model AUCs only. Studies were categorised into Category A (ICI response, RECIST-defined) and Category B (OS prognosis). As few studies reported confidence intervals, meta-analysis was not feasible; descriptive synthesis (medians, ranges) was performed instead. Results Category A comprised 7 AUCs from 4 studies (cohorts 11–384 patients); 6 of 7 were derived from IMvigor210, indicating overlap between studies, while the smallest-n estimate (n = 11) came from a separate cohort (GSE111636). The most robust model (Chen S et al. 2020, 10-gene ICIR-Score) achieved an internal validation AUC of 0.752 (95% CI 0.654–0.834, n = 98). External validation AUCs ranged 0.640–0.733 (median 0.669); whole-cohort AUCs ranged 0.719–0.805 (median 0.762). Category B comprised 24 OS AUC estimates from 4 studies. Training AUCs (cohorts 278–405 patients, all TCGA-BLCA-derived) increased across timepoints: 1-year median 0.667, 3-year median 0.695, 5-year median 0.730. External validation came from one study only (Zhang X et al. 2025, GSE32548 and GSE32894): 1-year median 0.670, 3-year median 0.710, 5-year median 0.726. Internal validation and whole-cohort estimates were likewise from one study only (Li Z et al. 2024, AUCs 0.751–0.763). Conclusions AI models show moderate-to-good discrimination for ICI response and OS prognosis in BLCA, but evidence is constrained by reliance on a single trial cohort (IMvigor210) and training cohort (TCGA-BLCA), with internal and external OS validation each corroborated by only one study, limiting generalisability. Larger, prospective, externally validated studies with consistent uncertainty reporting are needed.

The OncologistVol. 31(Supplement_2)
King's College London (GB), Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust (GB), London Cancer (GB), Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Cybergenetics (United States) (US), CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence (GB), Velindre Cancer Centre (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Buckingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.