AI IN PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSTICS – A REVIEW

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in psychiatry, with side effects on solutions stemming from the subjectivity of diagnosis, limited care, and biological complexity, which is subject to threats. Mental disorders affect 293 million people worldwide and pose a burden on human health [9]. Aim: The aim of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge on AI applications in psychiatric diagnostics, with specific focus on: (1) analysis of communication traffic of AI algorithms, (2) analysis of the results of AI-based primary control, (3) extension of methodological and ethical implications, and (4) extension of research. Methods: A review of the research literature was conducted in the field of Basic Language Processing (NLP) in digital phenotyping, AI-assisted neuroimaging, and the ethical and legal implications of implementing these technologies. Meta-analyses, specific reviews, and original empirical studies completed between 2015 and 2026 were analyzed. Results: A meta-analysis reported a cumulative AI diagnostic accuracy of 85% and a therapeutic efficacy of 84% in specific applications [8]. NLP enabled independent assessment, achieving an 86% (AUC 0.93) in studies on psychosis risk states [18]. Chatbots (Woebot, Wysa, Youper) demonstrate the consequences of problem occurrence and anxiety [9]. A review of 555 neuroimaging models revealed that 83.1% of the symptoms appear as a consequence rather than being triggered by a utility [32]. The most important ethical concerns were identified, including algorithm opacity ("black box"), liability, and data privacy [54, 56, 61]. Conclusions: AI in psychiatric diagnostics has demonstrated transformative potential, particularly in the areas of NLP and digital phenotyping, but current neuroimaging models require methodological improvements. The development of comprehensive ethical frameworks and extensions, simple algorithms, and model validation in large, population-based cohorts are essential. The ultimate success of AI in psychiatry will depend on striking a balance between technological innovation and respect for fundamental ethical values, while maintaining a paramount clinical role in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(51).2026.6494
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI IN PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSTICS – A REVIEW

Wiktor Rybicki, Radosław Dutczak, Aleksandra Wojtera, Mateusz Okoń et al.
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

AI IN PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSTICS – A REVIEW

Wiktor Rybicki, Radosław Dutczak, Aleksandra Wojtera, Mateusz Okoń, Iga Maria Owczarek-Danowska, Alicja Korpacka, Patrycja Mularczyk, Aleksandra Sobieska, Alicja Gawlik, Julia Jaguszewska, Weronika Martyna Górska
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being used in psychiatry, with side effects on solutions stemming from the subjectivity of diagnosis, limited care, and biological complexity, which is subject to threats. Mental disorders affect 293 million people worldwide and pose a burden on human health [9]. Aim: The aim of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge on AI applications in psychiatric diagnostics, with specific focus on: (1) analysis of communication traffic of AI algorithms, (2) analysis of the results of AI-based primary control, (3) extension of methodological and ethical implications, and (4) extension of research. Methods: A review of the research literature was conducted in the field of Basic Language Processing (NLP) in digital phenotyping, AI-assisted neuroimaging, and the ethical and legal implications of implementing these technologies. Meta-analyses, specific reviews, and original empirical studies completed between 2015 and 2026 were analyzed. Results: A meta-analysis reported a cumulative AI diagnostic accuracy of 85% and a therapeutic efficacy of 84% in specific applications [8]. NLP enabled independent assessment, achieving an 86% (AUC 0.93) in studies on psychosis risk states [18]. Chatbots (Woebot, Wysa, Youper) demonstrate the consequences of problem occurrence and anxiety [9]. A review of 555 neuroimaging models revealed that 83.1% of the symptoms appear as a consequence rather than being triggered by a utility [32]. The most important ethical concerns were identified, including algorithm opacity ("black box"), liability, and data privacy [54, 56, 61]. Conclusions: AI in psychiatric diagnostics has demonstrated transformative potential, particularly in the areas of NLP and digital phenotyping, but current neuroimaging models require methodological improvements. The development of comprehensive ethical frameworks and extensions, simple algorithms, and model validation in large, population-based cohorts are essential. The ultimate success of AI in psychiatry will depend on striking a balance between technological innovation and respect for fundamental ethical values, while maintaining a paramount clinical role in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social ScienceVol. 1(3(51))
Medical University of Silesia (PL), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Uniwersytecki Szpital Dziecięcy (PL), Adal (Poland) (PL), 1 Military Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic (PL), Our Lady of Perpetual Help (US), Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny Nr 2 (PL), Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie (PL), University of Warsaw (PL), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL), University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.