Are Chinese Preschoolers Ready for the AI Era? Evidence from a Large-Scale National Study in China

Research Findings: This study addressed a measurement gap in early childhood AI education by developing and validating the Chinese Preschoolers’ AI Literacy Scale (CPALS). Grounded in the five-dimensional SIACC framework – Safety, Identity, Attitude, Cognition, and Capability – the 41-item scale was administered to 10,341 preschoolers and showed strong reliability and validity. Cluster analysis with a refined sample of 8,512 children identified three unevenly distributed profiles: a dominant “Competent” group (50.59%), a large “Sufficient” group (37.37%), and a smaller “Emerging” group (12.04%). The “Competent” group scored highly across dimensions, especially Cognition and Safety. The “Sufficient” group was balanced but weaker in Identity and Attitude. The “Emerging” group lagged overall, particularly in Identity and Capability, while showing higher Cognition and Attitude. Practice or Policy: These internally unbalanced profiles show that one-size-fits-all AI education is insufficient. The SIACC dimensions help teachers observe how children protect information, distinguish AI from people, question AI content, and maintain their agency. Profile results can guide responsive pedagogy: routines for the “Emerging” group, reflective comparison for the “Sufficient” group, and open-ended, critical activities for the “Competent” group. Teacher preparation should train teachers to scaffold agency during play and inquiry. Policy should frame early AI literacy around agency, reflection, and emerging metacognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Early Education and Development
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2026.2716775
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Chinese Preschoolers Ready for the AI Era? Evidence from a Large-Scale National Study in China

Huihua He, Wenwei Luo, Jin Liu, Hui Li et al.
Early Education and Development
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

Are Chinese Preschoolers Ready for the AI Era? Evidence from a Large-Scale National Study in China

Huihua He, Wenwei Luo, Jin Liu, Hui Li, Minqi Gao, Junsheng Xiao
article en

Abstract

Research Findings: This study addressed a measurement gap in early childhood AI education by developing and validating the Chinese Preschoolers’ AI Literacy Scale (CPALS). Grounded in the five-dimensional SIACC framework – Safety, Identity, Attitude, Cognition, and Capability – the 41-item scale was administered to 10,341 preschoolers and showed strong reliability and validity. Cluster analysis with a refined sample of 8,512 children identified three unevenly distributed profiles: a dominant “Competent” group (50.59%), a large “Sufficient” group (37.37%), and a smaller “Emerging” group (12.04%). The “Competent” group scored highly across dimensions, especially Cognition and Safety. The “Sufficient” group was balanced but weaker in Identity and Attitude. The “Emerging” group lagged overall, particularly in Identity and Capability, while showing higher Cognition and Attitude. Practice or Policy: These internally unbalanced profiles show that one-size-fits-all AI education is insufficient. The SIACC dimensions help teachers observe how children protect information, distinguish AI from people, question AI content, and maintain their agency. Profile results can guide responsive pedagogy: routines for the “Emerging” group, reflective comparison for the “Sufficient” group, and open-ended, critical activities for the “Competent” group. Teacher preparation should train teachers to scaffold agency during play and inquiry. Policy should frame early AI literacy around agency, reflection, and emerging metacognition.

Early Education and Development
Shanghai Normal University (CN), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.