THE LIMINAL FIELD: Anthropomorphic

Short Description A critique of the anthropomorphic misconception of the Self. The text explains why imagining the Self as a “super‑I” blocks its presence in daily life and describes how recognizing oneself as energy enables the Self to operate within the human experience. Abstract Anthropomorphic dismantles the idea that the Self is an enhanced human figure. It argues that this misconception prevents the incarnated I from functioning as the operative interface of the Self. The text expands the perspective of life beyond human physicality, proposing that the human must first conceive itself as energy. Once this occurs, the Self can participate in daily life through a combined action in which the Self directs and the human executes. The work distinguishes between contact‑energy and animation‑energy, situating the soul within the deeper animic field that becomes accessible when the sense of life transcends the anthropomorphic view. OpenAIRE Description This work analyzes the conceptual barrier created by anthropomorphic interpretations of the Self. It proposes an energetic ontology in which the human being must conceive itself as energy to allow the Self to operate within daily life. The text distinguishes material, energetic, and animic fields, emphasizing the role of animation‑energy and the soul in transcending physical limitations. Relevant to studies of consciousness, energetic ontology, animic fields, and expanded models of identity. Extended Description Anthropomorphic addresses a foundational misunderstanding in human self‑conception: the tendency to imagine the Self as a superior human figure. This anthropomorphic projection prevents the incarnated I from accessing the deeper energetic and animic dimensions of existence. The text argues that the human being must first conceive itself as energy, thereby enabling a structural shift in which the Self becomes present in everyday life. The work expands the notion of life beyond physicality, suggesting that non‑human and extra‑physical forms of life may be purely energetic. This broader perspective reframes human existence within a universe whose structure exceeds anthropocentric interpretation. Once the human recognizes energy as its structural foundation, death becomes a surpassed concept, and the Self can direct action through an integrated mode of operation. The text introduces a distinction between contact‑energy—associated with matter and its underlying energetic field—and animation‑energy, which belongs to the deeper animic field that animates both matter and energy. The soul is presented as the manifestation of this animic field. The emergence of the sense of life activates this field, bringing the Self into daily experience and allowing the human to operate from a deeper, non‑anthropomorphic dimension of identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22031057
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE LIMINAL FIELD: Anthropomorphic

Oliva FMOO
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

THE LIMINAL FIELD: Anthropomorphic

Oliva FMOO
article en

Abstract

Short Description A critique of the anthropomorphic misconception of the Self. The text explains why imagining the Self as a “super‑I” blocks its presence in daily life and describes how recognizing oneself as energy enables the Self to operate within the human experience. Abstract Anthropomorphic dismantles the idea that the Self is an enhanced human figure. It argues that this misconception prevents the incarnated I from functioning as the operative interface of the Self. The text expands the perspective of life beyond human physicality, proposing that the human must first conceive itself as energy. Once this occurs, the Self can participate in daily life through a combined action in which the Self directs and the human executes. The work distinguishes between contact‑energy and animation‑energy, situating the soul within the deeper animic field that becomes accessible when the sense of life transcends the anthropomorphic view. OpenAIRE Description This work analyzes the conceptual barrier created by anthropomorphic interpretations of the Self. It proposes an energetic ontology in which the human being must conceive itself as energy to allow the Self to operate within daily life. The text distinguishes material, energetic, and animic fields, emphasizing the role of animation‑energy and the soul in transcending physical limitations. Relevant to studies of consciousness, energetic ontology, animic fields, and expanded models of identity. Extended Description Anthropomorphic addresses a foundational misunderstanding in human self‑conception: the tendency to imagine the Self as a superior human figure. This anthropomorphic projection prevents the incarnated I from accessing the deeper energetic and animic dimensions of existence. The text argues that the human being must first conceive itself as energy, thereby enabling a structural shift in which the Self becomes present in everyday life. The work expands the notion of life beyond physicality, suggesting that non‑human and extra‑physical forms of life may be purely energetic. This broader perspective reframes human existence within a universe whose structure exceeds anthropocentric interpretation. Once the human recognizes energy as its structural foundation, death becomes a surpassed concept, and the Self can direct action through an integrated mode of operation. The text introduces a distinction between contact‑energy—associated with matter and its underlying energetic field—and animation‑energy, which belongs to the deeper animic field that animates both matter and energy. The soul is presented as the manifestation of this animic field. The emergence of the sense of life activates this field, bringing the Self into daily experience and allowing the human to operate from a deeper, non‑anthropomorphic dimension of identity.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after D.O. Ott (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.