PROMPT-TIME CROSS-LINGUAL TRANSFER FOR LOW-RESOURCE LANGUAGES

Large language models (LLMs) can translate low-resource (LR) languages from a prompt alone, but whether this reflects genuine cross-lingual transfer or surface-cuedriven task recognition remains unclear. Using a 10-language subset of the LoResLM “Rosetta Stone” benchmark in a controlled regime where in-context demonstrations are high-resource (HR)!EN pairs and the LR language appears only in the final query, I evaluate four multilingual LLMs across six prompt conditions. Two findings qualify the linguistically diverse prompting recommendation: a single well-chosen close donor matches or outperforms typologically diverse mixtures, and close donors beat far donors in 82.5% of language–model cells (+5:0 chrF++). A mixed-effects regression over 12,320 observations identifies character trigram overlap—not genealogical distance—as the strongest predictor of translation quality. The results support interpreting prompt-time “transfer” as task location and surface-form activation. Practical guideline: prefer donors with high character level overlap over typologically diverse ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/531k-6q91
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PROMPT-TIME CROSS-LINGUAL TRANSFER FOR LOW-RESOURCE LANGUAGES

Elisei Stakovskii
UNC Libraries
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

PROMPT-TIME CROSS-LINGUAL TRANSFER FOR LOW-RESOURCE LANGUAGES

Elisei Stakovskii
article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can translate low-resource (LR) languages from a prompt alone, but whether this reflects genuine cross-lingual transfer or surface-cuedriven task recognition remains unclear. Using a 10-language subset of the LoResLM “Rosetta Stone” benchmark in a controlled regime where in-context demonstrations are high-resource (HR)!EN pairs and the LR language appears only in the final query, I evaluate four multilingual LLMs across six prompt conditions. Two findings qualify the linguistically diverse prompting recommendation: a single well-chosen close donor matches or outperforms typologically diverse mixtures, and close donors beat far donors in 82.5% of language–model cells (+5:0 chrF++). A mixed-effects regression over 12,320 observations identifies character trigram overlap—not genealogical distance—as the strongest predictor of translation quality. The results support interpreting prompt-time “transfer” as task location and surface-form activation. Practical guideline: prefer donors with high character level overlap over typologically diverse ones.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.