Gender Disparity in Authorship of Critical Care Scientific Publications From Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether gender disparity in authorship of critical care scientific publications is greater in studies originating from low- and middle-income countries (L/MICs) compared with those from high-income countries (HICs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis. SETTING: Original research publications, including observational studies and randomized controlled trials, published from 2018 to 2022 in the ten critical care journals with the highest 2022 impact factors as reported by Clarivate Analytics Journal Citation Reports. PATIENTS: A total of 4,982 publications, 4,479 from HICs, and 503 from L/MICs, comprising 50,357 authors. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We evaluated the proportion of women authors overall, and in first and senior positions; proportions of coauthors; differences by country income classification; temporal trends; and subgroup analyses stratified by funding type. Women accounted for 31.3% of all authors, 35.4% of first authors, and 21.4% of senior authors. Women's representation was higher in L/MICs than in HICs (38.2% vs. 30.6%; p < 0.01). The proportion of women in first (40.7% vs. 34.7%; p < 0.01) and senior (27.6% vs. 20.7%; p < 0.01) positions was also higher in publications from L/MICs. Coauthorships (i.e., the dyad of first and senior authors) involving at least one woman accounted for less than 30% across all publications. There were temporal increases in overall and senior woman authorship in HICs (p < 0.01 for both) and in overall authorship in L/MICs (p = 0.02). Women authors were more frequently represented among funded publications from L/MICs. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-impact critical care journals, substantial gender disparities persisted in authorship of publications. Women are better represented in publications from L/MICs, and there was an increase in women's authorship over time in both HICs and L/MICs from 2018 to 2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007309
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Disparity in Authorship of Critical Care Scientific Publications From Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries

Laura Jurema dos Santos, Amanda Quintairos, Jorge I.F. Salluh, Antonio P. Nassar et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Gender Disparity in Authorship of Critical Care Scientific Publications From Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries

Laura Jurema dos Santos, Amanda Quintairos, Jorge I.F. Salluh, Antonio P. Nassar, Filipe Amado, Sangeeta Mehta, Roberta M.L. Roepke, Renato D. Oliveira
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether gender disparity in authorship of critical care scientific publications is greater in studies originating from low- and middle-income countries (L/MICs) compared with those from high-income countries (HICs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis. SETTING: Original research publications, including observational studies and randomized controlled trials, published from 2018 to 2022 in the ten critical care journals with the highest 2022 impact factors as reported by Clarivate Analytics Journal Citation Reports. PATIENTS: A total of 4,982 publications, 4,479 from HICs, and 503 from L/MICs, comprising 50,357 authors. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We evaluated the proportion of women authors overall, and in first and senior positions; proportions of coauthors; differences by country income classification; temporal trends; and subgroup analyses stratified by funding type. Women accounted for 31.3% of all authors, 35.4% of first authors, and 21.4% of senior authors. Women's representation was higher in L/MICs than in HICs (38.2% vs. 30.6%; p < 0.01). The proportion of women in first (40.7% vs. 34.7%; p < 0.01) and senior (27.6% vs. 20.7%; p < 0.01) positions was also higher in publications from L/MICs. Coauthorships (i.e., the dyad of first and senior authors) involving at least one woman accounted for less than 30% across all publications. There were temporal increases in overall and senior woman authorship in HICs (p < 0.01 for both) and in overall authorship in L/MICs (p = 0.02). Women authors were more frequently represented among funded publications from L/MICs. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-impact critical care journals, substantial gender disparities persisted in authorship of publications. Women are better represented in publications from L/MICs, and there was an increase in women's authorship over time in both HICs and L/MICs from 2018 to 2022.

Critical Care Medicine
University of Toronto (CA), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), AC Camargo Hospital (BR), D’Or Institute for Research and Education (BR), Sinai Health System (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.